Posts by date

Sector and Air Top quality Companies Spar at EPA’s General public Listening to on New Wooden Stove Laws

Posted by Earth Stove on February 28, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , , , , , ,
Most of the controversy at the EPA’s public listening to on their new residential wood heater restrictions was not about outside wood boilers or other unregulated heaters but about the conventional wood stove.
The biggest bloc of speakers was from market that appeared to have a effectively-coordinated, constant concept that these principles are sick conceived and counter-productive.&nbsp Most of the market speakers manufactured the position that the policies would like elevate expense of stoves significantly, therefore slowing the change from previous, much more polluting stoves, to new, cleaner ones.&nbsp They mentioned the resolution to wood smoke must emphasis on shifting out older stove, not striving to squeeze yet another gram an hour or two out of newer types.
Far more than a dozen air good quality officers and advocates spoke just as passionately about the want for cleaner stoves, expressing general assist for the proposed rules and arguing for a limited timetable for them to take effect.&nbsp Condition officials from NH, VT, MA, CT, MN and WA argued for the regulations whilst a single condition, Maine, sided significantly more with market.&nbsp Patricia Aho, Commissioner from the Maine Office of Environmental Protection expressed numerous reservations about the proposed rule, like strong reservations about a shift toward a lot more catalytic stoves.&nbsp Several condition officers known as for Section 1 expectations, which just take impact proper absent, to be stricter.
An assistant for Senator Patrick Leahy from Vermont mentioned the Senator was typically supportive and would be offering official written feedback.&nbsp He like several of the speakers talked about the value of wooden stoves for center and reduce-revenue buyers. A legislator from Missouri on the reverse aspect of the political spectrum said it is very clear that the “EPA is attempting to outlaw wood stoves” and that the EPA should not permit “environmental groups to be concerned in the rulemaking.”
A single notable big difference among the EPA and most state officials is that state officials also all talked about the importance of wood and pellet as a neighborhood, cost-effective and renewable vitality supply, themes that are mainly absent in the EPA proposal or website.
One steady conversing stage echoed by many sector presenters was that catalytic stoves executed effectively only in the laboratory and that customers did not operate them effectively in their homes, leading to surplus pollution.&nbsp A lot of in market called on the EPA to enable non-catalytic stoves to fulfill a more lenient emission common even though keeping cat stoves to a far more stringent 1.&nbsp Tom Morrissey, proprietor of Woodstock Soapstone vigorously defended catalytic stoves and named into question a report funded by US and Canadian non-cat producers.
While most of industry speakers supported modify-outs above tighter emission specifications for new stoves, one producer who tends to make the exempt, uncertified stoves appeared to advocating for ongoing ability to market these stoves.&nbsp The EPA estimates that about twenty,000 new exempt, uncertified stoves are marketed and installed each and every yr.&nbsp
Numerous of the companies argued for the need for promote-by means of intervals and more lead-time to comply with the new specifications.&nbsp Other stakeholders named for an end of the sale of unqualified outdoor wood boilers as soon as possible, with no market-through period of time.&nbsp
An importer of European boilers urged the EPA to also settle for the Brookhaven take a look at strategy for boilers with thermal storage and established an achievable emission concentrate on for that technique which involves start-up emissions.&nbsp A retailer of Central Boiler out of doors boilers from New Hampshire talked about his decrease-revenue shoppers who could not afford a competent unit, and urged the EPA to let him to a reasonable sell-through time period for his competent units.
A producer of fireplaces known as on the EPA to control fireplaces, instead of exempting them again, as the EPA proposes.&nbsp The American Lung Association strongly supported this, also urging that fireplaces be regulated.&nbsp Many associates of masonry stove builders urged the EPA to more function with them to make certain that their units could be qualified.
The CEO of US Stoves famous that the SBA and OMB had severe troubles with the EPA’s proposed guidelines and stressed how numerous of their consumers ended up reduced-cash flow residences that are very delicate to even small value boosts.&nbsp US Stoves and other individuals at the moment market quite a number of EPA licensed versions in the $ 600 – $ 900 variety, equivalent to the price of stoves in the seventies when modified for inflation.

Several companies, which includes the Alliance for Green Warmth, spoke of the benefits of shoppers having entry to third-get together verified performance quantities employing a consistent performance measurement and obtaining that amount prominently shown on a hold-tag on the showroom flooring.&nbsp The EPA proposed to remove the hangtag with no clarification as to why.

Heated Up!

four Factors Why Wooden and Pellet Stove Effectiveness Numbers are Unreliable

Posted by Earth Stove on February 22, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , , ,
Baffled about stove efficiencies?&nbsp You are not alone.&nbsp Even most individuals in the sector are perplexed – or really don’t want to really let buyers know what is likely on.&nbsp Granted, it is complex and tough to describe stove efficiencies to men and women who are not experts, but stove companies also have their own incentives for obfuscating what the quantities truly imply. Heating with wooden and pellets can be an excellent way to affordably warmth your residence with a nearby, renewable gas. &nbspBut the sooner the EPA demands companies to disclose precise efficiencies, the much better it will be for shoppers.

Listed here are 4 primary factors why stove efficiencies are unreliable:.
one. Not like all other heating and cooling gear that has third party-verified efficiencies, the EPA has in no way necessary that stove manufacturers report their analyzed efficiencies. &nbspThe consequence is that stove companies routinely promote efficiencies that are increased than their genuine efficiency.
two. This confusion turned even worse in 2009 when the IRS said that companies can self-certify their effectiveness employing the European decrease warmth value (LHV) relatively than the American greater heating value (HHV).&nbsp Virtually overnight, every manufacturer claimed that all their stoves have been at the very least 75% successful in get to qualify for the federal tax credit rating (which at that time was $ 1,500 but has now expired.)&nbsp
three. Numerous pellet stoves are not EPA-qualified, and, as a result, may possibly have extremely minimal efficiency. The EPA regulates particulate subject in wooden and pellet stoves that have an air to fuel ratio of less than 35 to 1.&nbsp If they have an air ratio higher than that, they operate a lot more like a hearth, and are not controlled. Some organizations decided to put excess air through their firebox to keep away from regulation but this helps make their effectiveness fall substantially. The EPA internet site&nbsp explains that “Some pellet stove designs are topic to the wooden stove regulations, whilst other people are exempt thanks to a substantial air to gas ratio.” About half of all pellet stoves are not qualified.&nbsp Despite the fact that most pellet stoves on the marketplace nowadays have efficiencies earlier mentioned sixty%, there are some as reduced as 40 – fifty%.&nbsp Even so, nearly all assert to be at minimum 75% for reasons of the federal tax credit score.
four. Producers can use a variety of different techniques to test for effectiveness and choose the way that makes their goods search most successful.&nbsp Moreover, they can do the testing in their very own lab instead of obtaining a reputable, 3rd social gathering lab do impartial testing.&nbsp
That said, not all manufacturers exaggerate their quantities and most make dependable, excellent top quality stoves.&nbsp But there is not a tradition of transparency amid stove producers, but rather a lifestyle that only discloses what is necessary by regulation to be disclosed.&nbsp There are three factors shoppers can do to shield them selves from acquiring an inefficient stove.
one. Purchase a stove that reports its real efficiency final results to the EPA.&nbsp A handful of producers have not too long ago provided the EPA with 3rd celebration-verified effectiveness figures, and we hope much more will do so in the foreseeable future.&nbsp There are now 19 stoves on the EPA’s record with third confirmed quantities utilizing HHV.&nbsp The greater part of these are wooden stoves.&nbsp Only one pellet stove producer, Seraph, has offered verified effectiveness quantities.&nbsp Blaze King is the only business to offer confirmed efficiency quantities for all their stoves. For a checklist of the 19 stoves, click on here.&nbsp&nbspUsually, catalytic stoves are five – 10% higher efficiency than non-catalytic stoves and are significantly less difficult to keep a fireplace burning cleanly and successfully right away.
2. If you want to make certain to get a higher effectiveness pellet stove, get a single that is EPA accredited.&nbsp Just take manufacturer representations about effectiveness with a huge grain of salt, especially if they do not specify no matter whether the figure is in LHV or HHV.&nbsp (A stove that is 68% HHV will most likely be close to 75% LHV.) &nbsp
3. Preserve in head that with wooden stoves, efficiency is not just a purpose of the stove, but also how the operator makes use of it.&nbsp Make sure to use seasoned wooden that is below twenty% moisture content material to get the greatest performance out of your stove.&nbsp
Qualifications: New, EPA certified non-catalytic stoves are almost all in the 55 – seventy five% efficiency range, HHV, with most in the high 60s and reduced 70s. Catalytic stoves will likely be in between 70% – 82%. &nbspA 20% distinction in gas effectiveness can incorporate up to a great deal of financial savings for customers, whether or not you purchase your firewood or cut it oneself.
With pellet stoves, the efficiency variety is even increased and buyers stand to acquire or shed a complete thirty% or even forty% in gas effectiveness relying on what product they acquire. &nbspAt least one particular pellet stove on the marketplace receives only 33% performance and yet another forty nine%, but most are in the 60s and 70s, and some will be in the reduced 80s, once again calculated utilizing HHV. &nbspSector leaders have conceded that most pellet stoves are not 70% productive even with the EPA approximated default of seventy eight% efficiency.&nbsp
Nearly no business, agency or non-revenue has brazenly and honestly discussed this issue and tried out to assist unravel the confusion about efficiency quantities. One of the number of sites that has anything on it is www.combustionportal.org. &nbspIt says “On February 6, 2007, the EPA authorized use of the CSA B415 take a look at protocol as a implies by which to decide efficiency ratings. The IRS sponsored wooden stove tax credit rating program permits producers to use a distinct technique of deciding effectiveness. IRS enables laboratories to use higher versatility in figuring out the thermal effectiveness ranking for tax credit score functions.”

The Alliance for Eco-friendly Warmth is a non-earnings client organzation that encourages cleaner and much more productive wooden heating. For more information about us and our applications, click right here.

Heated Up!

Testimony in Help of Thermal Vitality in Maryland’s Renewable Portfolio Common

Posted by Earth Stove on February 21, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , , ,

HB 931 – Renewable Strength Portfolio Standard – Thermal Power
Day: February twenty, 2014
Committee: Financial Matters
Assistance

John Ackerly, President
Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat
6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 407
Takoma Park, Maryland 20912
301-841-7755

Email: jackerly@forgreenheat.org

Place:

The Alliance for Green Heat urges the Financial Issues Committee to situation a favorable report on HB 931 both in its current kind or with amendments that leaves current biomass services in Tier one of the RPS.

Responses:

&nbsp

Delegate Dana Stein, sponsor of
HB 931

Initial of all, we would like to thank the Maryland Thermal Strength Job Drive and assistance their recommendations. While it was disappointing that the bill to consist of thermal woody biomass in the RPS previous 12 months did not pass, the generation of this Task Power was an exceptional thought so that there could be far more regularity to thermal power pathways in the RPS.

Any RPS that focuses on only one renewable energy pathway – electrical energy – results in unfair and primarily unintended implications for other power pathways, notably heat vitality. If an RPS excludes warmth strength, we get rid of leverage above a enormous piece of the power pie. Including thermal power provides us numerous far more techniques to lessen fossil fuels and carry much more renewable systems to the desk so that we can obtain even a lot more aggressive renewable power targets.

The Alliance for Eco-friendly Warmth focuses on residential wooden and pellet heating which is by far the biggest contributor of residential renewable strength in Maryland and the United States.&nbsp

There are twelve million installations of wood and pellet heating appliances in the United States, when compared to significantly less than 50 percent a million photo voltaic panel installations. Biomass warmth can tap into this massive household renewable power market place because it is much far more inexpensive than solar or geothermal. The difficulty is that most residences in Maryland and the US that use wood warmth have old stoves that are too polluting. We have focused our incentives on photo voltaic and geothermal, which favor wealthy family members and remaining out rural center and lower-revenue people who warmth with wooden and pellets. Including household thermal biomass in the RPS will extend the advantages of the RPS to average Maryland people and not just focus those benefits on the wealthy family members that set up photo voltaic and geothermal and who are typically concentrated in Montgomery and Howard counties.

We think all Maryland homes ought to have the option to participate in our renewable vitality long term and that indicates including systems like new, large performance EPA certified wooden and pellet stoves in the RPS. We commend the Maryland Power Administration for starting up a grant software for wood and pellet stoves, like they have for photo voltaic, but this rebate is basically not enough for numerous people to get over the original purchase price of a method that can properly warmth their whole property. Residential thermal RECS will enable reduced and center-earnings Maryland family members to benefit from this financial framework just like rich Maryland households.

For these factors, we strongly favor reforming the RPS to be a lot more expense efficient and far more technologies neutral in reaching the renewable vitality ambitions that are essential to Maryland’s financial and environmental overall health and properly-currently being.&nbsp

HB931 creates an incentive to far more efficiently utilize our finite biomass methods, putting much less stress on the sustainability of our forests to satisfy growing energy requires. HB931 will enhance jobs, prosperity, and economic advantages related with utilizing biomass for energy in Maryland.

We support the sixty five% effectiveness bare minimum. If anything, with regard to household wooden and pellet heating, 65% is as well minimal. Most household wood and pellet heaters accomplish 70% performance and the ideal kinds are more than 80%, measured&nbspin higher heat value (HHV) using the EPA endorsed CSA B415.one calculation. Presented the varied stakeholders impacted by this laws, we believe 65% efficiency&nbspis truthful and achievable.

We also strongly assistance excluding wood squander that contains handled or painted wooden since most non-utility scale crops do not have the emission control techniques that could take care of wooden squander with out generating air good quality troubles.

Thank you.

&nbsp

Heated Up!

HPBA Joins Lawsuit Against EPA

Posted by Earth Stove on February 11, 2014 with No Commentsas , , ,

In November, 2013 the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) joined a lawsuit brought against the EPA arguing that its members have and are suffered economic injury as a result of the EPA’s failure to enact the NSPS in a timely way. The lawsuit had already been brought by non-profits that are at odds with […]

More States Start Innovative Stove Incentive Programs

Posted by Earth Stove on February 8, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , ,

More states are starting or changing their stove incentive programs to tighten eligibility, require professional installation, and often, to install an outside air supply.  Until recently, incentive programs only required that wood stoves be EPA certified.  And even though the EPA certifies many pellet stoves, it does not recommend EPA certified pellet stoves be required […]

4 Myths About the EPA’s Proposed Wood Stove Regulations

Posted by Earth Stove on February 4, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , ,

In the weeks since the EPA unveiled their new regulations on residential wood heaters, many myths are starting to circulate in the right-wing media about what they mean.  It’s sometimes hard to tell if the authors are intentionally spreading misleading information about the regulations, or they simply haven’t done enough research to know that they […]

Experts Gather in Seattle to Design Cleaner Wood Stoves

Posted by Earth Stove on February 2, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , ,

By John Ackerly President, Alliance for Green Heat In January I attended an amazing conference where about 60 people came together to share ideas on building cleaner, more efficient stoves.  But the conference wasn’t just about stove design; it was also about how to incentivize them, how to monitor their use, and how to deploy […]