Posts by date

What Customers Require to Know about New EPA Wooden Stove Principles

Posted by Earth Stove on March 16, 2015 with No Commentsas , , , , , ,
In the prolonged guide-up to the&nbspEPA’s new guidelines on wooden and pellet stoves and boilers, there have been a lot of claims, predictions and fears. &nbspHere is a summary of the crucial factors in the NSPS that will effect you, the consumer.

The rule turns into legislation on Friday, Could 15, but will not expect to see many, if any, adjustments in your nearby hearth store until finally Jan. 1, 2016. &nbsp Scroll to the bottom to see a timeline of implementation.

Wooden stoves: Shoppers will scarcely notice any adjust right up until 2020. &nbspAs of 2016, stoves need to not emit a lot more than four.five grams and right after May fifteen, 2020, two grams an hour. &nbspThe most significant around term modify is that the actually cheap, uncertified stoves will no longer be on the market place after Jan. 1, 2016.&nbsp (These stoves, typically manufactured in China, sold for $ 300 – $ 600.)

Pellet stoves: Buyers will not discover considerably change listed here both. &nbspAs of Jan. 1, 2016 all pellet stoves will have to be accredited by the EPA.&nbsp Some designs are also very likely to get a lot more productive. &nbspIn 2020, pellet stoves also have to emit no more than two grams an hour. &nbspMost pellet stoves currently meet up with the 2020 normal.


Costs: There need to be no short time period price tag rises, but some companies say their prices may go up $ three hundred – $ four hundred in 2020.&nbsp Other folks say their prices won’t rise at all.

Retail “sell-through” period of time: Suppliers have until Dec. 31, 2015 to sell present stock.&nbsp Many stores do not carry something that can’t be offered below the new guidelines in any case. Beware of revenue this summer season and slide that are striving to unload inefficient stoves and boilers ahead of its unlawful to sell them!

Existing and next hand stoves: Existing stoves are not impacted by these principles, nor is the vibrant next hand marketplace for wooden stoves. States can regulate current and uncertified stoves and Washington and Oregon do not enable any person to set up an uncertified stove off the second hand market place.&nbsp All states enable customers to purchase and install 2nd hand licensed stoves.

Corn, coal and multi-gasoline stoves: Corn and coal stoves are not coated by EPA policies and can carry on to be marketed without any federal government emission regulation, so extended as they will not market that they can also use wood or pellets. Multi-gasoline stoves are no longer allowed.&nbsp Accredited stoves can only be marketed for the fuel that they are examined with, and there is not yet a check strategy for corn or coal.

Misleading promoting: Most companies have posted unverified and exaggerated efficiency claims on their brochures and sites.&nbsp The new principles specify how stove effectiveness is to be tested and noted, but its nonetheless mysterious if the&nbspEPA will crack down on the rampant exaggerated and misleading performance statements.&nbsp Blaze King and Seraph are only businesses that offer verified, correct performance figures of all their stoves to customers and the EPA. &nbspBeware of any stove that advertises more than 83% efficiency. &nbsp

Efficiency:&nbspThe EPA will start to demand effectiveness tests and reporting, but ninety five% of existing stoves will not have to be examined until 2020, so handful of stoves will be required to publish performance quantities.&nbsp To day, most organizations nonetheless deal with confirmed efficiency as private documents.

New hangtags: The EPA is receiving rid of the aged hang tags that consumers have been accustomed to on the showroom ground.&nbsp Instead, they are issuing particular, voluntary cling tags only for those stoves and boilers that presently meet the stricter Step 2 specifications (2 grams and hour) or that have been made and analyzed with cord wood. This will support shoppers far more effortlessly recognize the cleaner stoves and people that are made to be used with cordwood – the same variety of gas that customers use.&nbsp (At present, all stoves are analyzed with 2x4s and 4x4s, which burn off very differently than wire wood.)

Carbon monoxide (CO): The new principles do not limit the quantity of CO that can be emitted but call for that it be analyzed and documented. As with effectiveness, it is nonetheless unclear if CO levels from existing stoves will be obtainable before 2020.

Stoves examined with cordwood: The policies established up an option, voluntary compliance option for Stage two emission stages of 2.five grams an hour for stoves examined with twine wood. &nbspThis recognizes leaders in the industry who are optimizing their stoves for using twine wooden and encourages other producers to follow their case in point.

Export stoves: US producers can continue to make and promote stoves with no emission controls or tests to nations that even now let this.&nbsp These stoves have to be labeled as an “export stove. Could not be offered or operated within the United States.”&nbsp


Litigation: The deadline to file match over this rule is Might fifteen, 2015. &nbspThe major stove and boiler industry association, the HPBA, has indicated it will be filing suit, most likely above the cost usefulness of the 2020 emission requirements. &nbspAir quality or environmental groups might also sue, claiming the new specifications are as well lax. Our lawful professionals say that a go well with from both aspect would be hard to acquire.

Boilers &amp Furnaces

Boilers: Like stoves, boilers must fulfill Stage one emission boundaries by Might 15. &nbspRetailers can still offer more mature, uncertified and unqualified boilers through Dec. 31, 2015. &nbspIn 2020, they have to fulfill stricter emission limitations. &nbspDue to a schism between domestic boiler manufacturers and people importing far more superior European technologies, most examination labs are not willing to take a look at the imported units. &nbspThey may possibly face limitations to turning out to be certified by Jan. one, 2016.


Warm air furnaces: Furnaces that heat air, instead of water, got a reprieve from the EPA after intense advocacy by industry and force from Congress. &nbspSmall types have to satisfy Step 1 emission standards by May 15, 2016 and big kinds not until finally May 15, 2017.


Value: As opposed to stoves, possibilities for consumers will adjust much more, since the boiler furnace market had not been controlled and a lot of low-cost, lower-performance models were on the market place. &nbspPrices – and efficiencies- are likely to rise substantially but running fees will be significantly lower.

Humidity meters: Furnaces have to appear with a free dampness meter as of Jan. 1, 2016. &nbsp(Some advocates experienced urged all stoves to appear with moisture meters.)&nbsp

Heated Up!

Utah invoice HB 396: A Hastily Crafted Invoice that Misses the Mark

Posted by Earth Stove on March 2, 2015 with No Commentsas , , , , ,
Winter inversions, caused mainly by cars
and trucks, often obscure the Utah legislature
in a cloud of pollution that can last days.

A bill was just introduced in the Utah House of Representatives that would mandate certain types of change out programs, set air quality levels that can be used to call no burn days and otherwise undermine the ability of the state to help move toward cleaner burning and cleaner air.

The key to reducing wood smoke in Utah’s populated and often polluted valley surrounding Salt Lake City is a genuine partnership between the states air quality division, industry and other non-profits and stakeholders.  Ultimately, solutions are going to require funding, especially if a change out program is involved, which can be expensive.  For any significant amount of money to be used for change outs, the Utah governor and air quality division should support the change out, not have HB 396 thrust upon them, which will tie their hands.

Utah Governor Herbert’s proposed seasonal ban was ill conceived and drawn up without sufficient consultation.  HB 396 was similarly drawn up without sufficient consultation and will not lead to genuine solutions that can get solid funding.

Like most others, the Alliance did not support the seasonal ban proposed by the Governor, but HB 396 is not the solution.  HB 396 was drafted by key stove industry members and reflects the interests of some stove retailers and manufacturers, but does not embrace many solutions which can benefit homeowners who heat with wood and pellets.

There are a variety of proven ways to reduce wood smoke while protecting the rights of families who heat with wood and pellets.  HB 396 only refers to several strategies and it ties the hands of the Division of Air Quality, without even providing funding for solutions.  Wood stove change out programs are one of the effective strategies, but HB 396 does not include many options and best practices that other jurisdictions use in change outs to support high efficiency wood and pellet heating while reducing emissions at the same time.
This hastily crafted bill needs to emphasize the interests of all Utahans, more than the just retailers and stove manufacturers who drafted the bill.  Lines 28 and 29 which require consultation with representatives of the solid fuel burning industry while not mentioning representatives of other concerned groups is unfortunate.  The solid fuel burning industry does not represent the consumers who use their products any more than any other industry group represents consumers of their products.  For instance, one of the most important reasons people heat with wood and pellets is to save money, particularly lower income families.  However, the solid fuel burning industry refuses to release the efficiencies of the stoves they sell.  Some pellet stoves are between 40 – 50% efficient and some are between 70 – 80% efficient, but industry has long stonewalled consumer interests to know which stoves are more efficient than others. 
Industry has also actively opposed change out and incentive programs which require the disclosure of efficiency or only make the cleanest stoves eligible for replacing older, uncertified stoves.  Such options and programs, however, benefit consumers and should be considered in any change out program.
Ultimately the solution in Utah, like in any jurisdiction, requires the active engagement of all stakeholders and the consideration of all solutions – and funding.   If industry, DAQ, and other stakeholders can agree on the parameters of a change out program, it will be far easier to secure funding each year and for that funding to have the most impact.  HB 396 will not achieve that and pits the solid fuel industry against the interests of many other key stakeholders.
For these reasons, we urge the Legislature to vote against HB 396.
Over the last 4 years, the Alliance for Green Heat has also advocated on behalf of families who heat with wood and pellets with members of the Utah legislature, the Utah Division of Air Quality and the Utah Air Quality Board.  We provide expert background on wood heating technology, wood smoke emissions, and analysis.
On the current debate in Utah, we issued three short papers to help policymakers and the public better understand the importance of wood and pellet heating and options to improve air quality:
On February 24, we provided an informal briefing at the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) on options for reducing wood smoke that other jurisdictions are pursuing, none of which include a ban on stove use.  That powerpoint can be downloaded here: http://www.forgreenheat.org/upload/upload/AGH Utah presentation.pptx

Heated Up!