This month, New York became the first state in the country to set a minimum efficiency requirement in an ongoing pellet stove incentive program. The State will now only provide its $ 1,500 – $ 2,000 rebates to pellet stoves that are listed as 70% efficiency (HHV) or higher on the EPA’s list of certified stoves.
Two other states use efficiency values and a third is about to announce a similar change in their program.
Oregon has long provided far higher rebates to stoves with higher efficiency listings on the EPA list of wood and pellet stoves.
Massachusetts’ annual change-out program gives an additional rebate if the stove is listed at 65% or higher on the EPA stove list.
The change in New York’s program
, run by the New York State Energy and Research Development Agency (NYSERDA), will limit the number of currently eligible pellet stoves to about 30 models.
NYSERDA also requires that pellet stoves emit no more than 2 grams an hour and that the home does not have access to natural gas, two requirements that the Maryland rebate program also has.
Last year, NYSERDA gave rebates to help install about 500 pellet stoves and the Maryland program
averages about 800 pellet stoves per year.
In both states, this is a
significant boost to pellet stove sales.
One of the biggest differences between the two programs is that New York requires the trade-in of an old wood stove, unless you are a low income household, but the Maryland program does not.
Part of the motivation by states and programs to require that stoves have an efficiency listed on the EPA list of stoves
is to counter the widespread misinformation provided by manufacturers to consumers.
The Alliance for Green Heat has consistently urged incentive and change out program managers to include efficiency and other best practices
in program design.
This can be particularly problematic with lower income families who may have tried to calculate savings when purchasing a pellet stove, and are relying on manufacturer claims to get one of the higher efficiency stoves.
Incentive and change out programs that give larger amounts to lower income households may be helping those families purchase pellet stoves that are under 60% efficient, saddling them with higher fuel costs for the lifetime of the appliance.
The New York program provides a rebate of $ 2,000 for lower income households compared to $ 1,500 for others, and now protects them from misleading information about efficiencies. A large portion of the NYSERDA rebate recipients are low-income households. Both New York and Massachusetts qualify lower income families if they earn less than 80% of median income. The Massachusetts program was the first to use efficiency in a change out program, giving an additional $ 500 for stoves listed at 65% or higher on the EPA list of certified stoves. Stoves made by manufacturers who do not disclose actual, tested efficiencies to the public are not eligible for the bonus in Massachusetts or for anything in New York. Massachusetts also gives a higher rebate amount if you purchase an automated wood stove.
Many retailers welcome the change, as they are often caught between manufacturer efficiency claims and confused consumers.
However, the main hearth industry association representing residential wood and pellet stoves, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, continues to resist efforts to use stove efficiency in incentive and change-out programs.
HPBA provided this statement about the changes in the NYSERDA program: “Unfortunately, there are some very clean, and potentially very efficient, pellet stoves that were certified before efficiency data was required by the new NSPS, but NYSERDA’s program requirements exclude them from consumers’ options.”
Of the approximately 30 pellet stoves that are 2 grams an hour or less and 70% efficiency or more, there are a wide range of more expensive brands carried by specialty hearth stores and very inexpensive ones carried by big box stores.
And more than a third emit no more than 1 gram an hour.
The most efficient pellet stoves on the EPA list, from the Italian Extraflame line, are 87% and 85% efficiency, but do not appear to be on the US market yet.
For consumer tips on how to choose a wood or pellet stove, this website
offers advice on stove selection, installation, rebates in your state and how to know when a stove needs replacing.
The Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat was awarded a grant by the University of Maryland Extension (UME) to examine the Maryland wood and pellet stove rebate plan and other point out incentive packages and compose a paper on “best practices” for stove incentive packages.  The paper would be introduced at a conference, revealed as a UME truth sheet, offered on a UME webinar and posted on the internet sites for UME and the Alliance.  Key states we will search at incorporate Maryland, Maine
, New York, Oregon
, Washington and Massachusetts.  The Alliance has worked formerly with the College of Maryland Extension and created a set of wood heating reality sheets.
Background: In the final two several years, numerous states have initiated wood and pellet stove incentive applications and practically all of them have had to make adjustments right after establishing needs that did not work effectively.  Even though this is a typical part of the studying curve of establishing a system for any appliance or technological innovation, the lessons learned are important for other packages. It is also partly since revolutionary stove incentive applications that consider to target on cleanest or most effective stoves are new and there are not many illustrations to draw from.  Most states craft their very own system and get components from other states.  A lot more states are now in the approach of making a plan and could use a roadmap that lays out what labored nicely and what didn’t.
We will make contact with present packages to see if they have any info that they can release for us to evaluate.
At a bare minimum, we will do a entire examination of data that Maryland can share.
In other states, we will at minimum question for substantial amount details and gather as a lot as achievable from the internet.
We will assessment general public plan objectives of each software, no matter whether its primarily renewable energy production, smoke reduction, supporting to give inexpensive warmth for rural inhabitants or a mixture of the a few.
This will also involve interviews with the managers of individuals packages.
We will evaluation the requirements and demands of every single plan in terms of requiring professional set up and outside air, limiting eligibility of stoves by emissions and performance, restricting eligibility by spot or income of home, etc.
We will consider to create average expenses for the installation and/or elimination of each wooden stove, and match that with the advantages.
This venture taps into a core expertise of the Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat.
We have interactions with the managers of many incentive packages and have supplied suggestions and comments to numerous of them. This report will also be partly an current to a major report
on stove incentives we did three years ago that was funded by US Forest Service’s Wood Schooling and Study Middle.
The budget for the venture is $ seven,500 and the College of Maryland Extension Support grant handles a 3rd of that.
More states are starting or changing their stove incentive programs to tighten eligibility, require professional installation, and often, to install an outside air supply. Until recently, incentive programs only required that wood stoves be EPA certified. And even though the EPA certifies many pellet stoves, it does not recommend EPA certified pellet stoves be required […]