Top 10 stories in 2017 for wood and pellet heating

2017 may not have been the most momentous year for wood and pellet stoves, but every year is full of important stories and these are what we see as the top 10. Think we missed one of 2017’s top stories?  Leave a comment.
      1. Wood stove sales lag
Warmer winters and lower fossil fuel prices are likely the main causes of continued sluggish sales of wood stoves and inserts in 2017.  Gas appliances continue to gain in popularity.  The 2015 EPA regulations are rarely cited as contributing to the current malaise in the market, and local restrictions are unlikely to have much of an impact either.  The final weeks of 2017 and first week of 2018 brought arctic temperatures to much of the US, boosting sales of both pellets and stoves.  But will it last?
2. Funding for change out programs rolled back
Whoever thought a motorcycle company would deal a big blow to the stove industry?  To be fair, it had little to do with motorcycles and a lot to do with the Trump Administration wanting to do away with out-of-court air quality violations settlements that allowed polluters to pay part of their fine in programs that improve air quality.  Harley Davidson happened to be the poster child of companies willing to support a change out program, but not allowed to do so by the Trump Administration.  That pipeline of funding, up to 10 million a year, is now cut off, dealing another blow to programs seeking to get people to part ways with their old wood stove, and exchange it for a new pellet, gas or wood stove.
3. Congress – lots of expectation but no action
Three key initiatives – the BTU Act, the NSPS delay and the biomass heater tax credit – did not come to fruition in 2017.  All three initiatives remain in play in 2018, but with each passing month, 2018 will get more consumed by the fall election season. The BTU Act would help the entire biomass thermal energy sector and has some key backers, such as Senator Susan Collins (R-ME). The bills to delay NSPS deadlines by 3 years passed committees, largely on party lines.  With the razor thin majority in the Senate, Democratic support for these initiatives may be more important in 2018.
4. Cordwood test methods are on the rise
The ASTM E3053 cord wood test protocol developed largely by industry members was completed and is now an accepted alternative test method.  However, companies don’t appear to be lining up to use it to certify their stoves.  Meanwhile, NESCAUM is taking the lead in designing what they say is a much more realistic cordwood test method as it takes into account more frequent reloading.  That method appears to have EPA’s interest and may be more likely to be referenced by the federal and/or state governments.
5. The renewable energy movement gains steam, helping pellet systems
Despite a President who champions coal and fossil fuels, the renewable energy movement is gaining ground worldwide.  Automated pellet and chip heating systems are being installed more rapidly in Europe and are gaining wider acceptance in the US.  Pellet stoves and boilers are also becoming more recognized in green building circles.  Campuses, towns, cities and states striving to reduce fossil fuel use usually start with electricity and transition to green heating options. 
6. Anti-wood smoke groups gain legitimacy
In 2017, we saw a rise of clean air groups campaigning for more restrictions on wood stove installation and use.  Some of the core activists emerged years ago when their communities or homes were subjected to excessive smoke from outdoor wood boilers.  In 2017, the focus shifted more to wood stoves, mostly in communities in the West, but to some extent in the Northeast.  Often, tensions rose over lack of enforcement by local jurisdictions who didn’t have the resources, training and/or political will to deal with those creating excessive smoke.  Overall there is a growing recognition that wood smoke is a serious health concern and debates in local and state forums will likely grow in coming years.
7.  Consolidation of stove and pellet plants continues
In the wood and pellet stove world, Hearth & Home Technologies (HHT) did not announce major new acquisitions in 2017, but the company consolidated by moving Quadra-Fire and Vermont Castings production to its Pennsylvania facility.  However, 2017 also saw market share continue to slip away from higher-priced manufacturers like most HHT brands to the lower priced manufacturers that sell from hardware chains.  On the wood pellet front, Lignetics continued its buying spree, finalizing a deal to acquire New England Wood Pellet at the very end of 2017. 
8. DOE co-sponsors Wood Stove Design Challenge
After many years of sitting on the sidelines of thermal biomass, the Department of Energy found an entre in the 2018 Wood Stove Design Challenge.  DOE is providing funding and its PR department is issuing news releases, lending greater credibility and a higher profile to the event.  The competition features automated stoves and stoves that produce electricity to supplement wintertime solar PV output, showcasing new roles that wood stoves could play if they run more reliably cleaner in real world settings.  The competition will also showcase cordwood testing protocols and fossil fuel reductions achievable by wood stoves compared to solar panels.
9. NY, MD and MA recognize efficiency in stove programs
In 2017, three states began using efficiency criteria to determine eligibility in incentive or change out programs.  NY now requires pellet stoves to have verified efficiencies on the EPA list of certified stoves.  MD & MA provide higher incentives for stoves with verified efficiencies, as Oregon does, but with a far simpler formulas.  The rampant practice by most manufacturers of providing misleading and exaggerated efficiency values – a practice not tolerated in other HVAC sectors – motivated these states to act.
10. The new EPA wood heater regulations move forward
OK, 2017 was not a big news year for the new heater regulations, known as the NSPS.  But in 2017 all large forced air wood furnaces were required to be certified (including smaller ones who pretended to be large to evade certification in 2016).  In April, there were only six EPA certified furnaces ranging from 48% to 89% efficiency, now there are 16.  2017 was a pivotal year in that it marked the midpoint between 2015 and 2020, when all heaters must meet stricter emission standards.  And, with each passing month, more heaters become 2020 compliant as manufacturers hedge their bets in case Congress, the Administration or the courts do not derail the 2020 deadline. In 2017, some exciting new innovation hit the market, including automated MF Fire Catalyst, the Optima designed just to burn pressed logs and more coming soon.

Did we miss something?  Post a comment!

Heated Up!

Six tips to buy the right pellet stove

Retailers say BTU output can be most confusing issue
Glenn Robinson is one
of many retailers struggling
to help consumers avoid
relying on manufacturer
claims about BTU output.
Glenn Robinson has been selling and installing pellet, wood and coal stoves in Pennsylvania for 11 years, and one of the biggest problems he faces is sizing the stove.  “I became tired of false information from manufacturers about how many BTUs they claimed their stoves put out” he said in a recent interview.  “Customers see these exaggerated BTU numbers from a small stove and think it will heat their home, but it won’t.  The result is that the stove is undersized and there is premature wear and tear.  One model from a big name brand would only last for 3 – 4 months before needing repair or even full replacement,” he said.

Glenn is not alone in identifying exaggerated BTU listings as one of the biggest problems consumers face in buying a stove.  Scott Williamson, a Massachusetts pellet installation and repair technician says that he sees stoves “all the time that are being run on high 24/7 and pellet stoves just aren’t designed to do that.”  Both installers say that under sizing of pellet stoves is one of the biggest problems, and urge customers to consider larger (higher BTU output) stoves if they live in average size homes in the northern half of the country and plan to use the stove a lot.
Buying a pellet stove can be a confusing process for consumers. Retailers are likely to push the brands they sell and manufacturer websites don’t tell the whole story.  Objective, third party reviews are rare and often outdated.  Consumer Reports did a pretty good review in 2009 but used very limited criteria and didn’t test for durability.  The Alliance for Green Heat (AGH) also undertook third party testing in 2015 and issued a detailed online reporton some issues including BTU output, maintenance and efficiency. (Like Consumer Reports, AGH conducted completely independent testing by purchasing all the units and doing all of our own testing.)
This blog identifies and discusses six rules for consumers to keep in mind when buying a pellet stove, with a focus on sizing.  This is not an exhaustive list but it’s a good place to start: 1. Don’t undersize, 2. Beware of cheaper stoves, 3. Look for range of heat output, 4. Understand maintenance requirements of the stove, 5. Look for cleaner stoves and 6. Beware of stoves with no efficiency on the EPA list
AGH tested six popular pellet stoves.
Almost all performed well during
intensive 30 day testing, but did not
live up to some manufacturer claims.

Pellet stoves can be a very effective and affordable way to provide primary or secondary heat for your home without the smoke that wood stoves often create in the hands of the typical user. Wood stoves require lots of work on the fuel side of the equation, but pellet stoves involve more work on the appliance side of the equation. 
The Alliance for Green Heat also monitors advertising of pellet stoves and has found over the years that the great majority of companies vastly overrate the amount of heat their stoves put out.  The EPA list of certified wood and pellet stoves is not perfect but it remains the best source of BTU output for consumers. 
Most EPA-certified pellet stoves are listed as producing a maximum of 25,000 – 40,000 Btu and minimum of 7,000 – 13,000 Btu. The average pellet stove on the EPA list, according to data provided by third party test labs, put out a maximum of approximately 31,800 Btu and a minimum of approximately 10,050 Btu. 
The stove with the highest maximum Btu on the EPA list is the Harman P68 at 53,500 Btu (advertised at 71,200 Btu input).  When a stove manufacturer lists Btu input, it refers to amount of Btus in the fuel, if you were to get 100% of those Btus into the room.  But the average pellet stove is around 73% efficiency, which means you will get 73% of the fuel’s potential heat into the room.  (This is similar to the AFUE – the annual fuel utilization efficiency – that is used on gas and oil boilers and furnaces.)
The stove with the lowest maximum Btu is the Thelin Gnome pellet stove that puts out up to 9,000 Btus.  However the company advertises three times that – 27,000 Btus – without any explanation.  Manufacturers usually exaggerate Btu, thinking that it will make their stoves more attractive, but in the case of the Thelin Gnome, there are people looking for stoves to heat very small places and the exaggerated Btu output may make them think even the Gnome is too big.
Here are six critical things for consumers to keep in mind when purchasing a pellet stove:
1.       1. Don’t undersize. If the stove is going to be your primary heat source you will likely need a medium or large pellet stove, even if a smaller unit advertises high BTU output.  Ignore BTU numbers on manufacturers websites and literature and check the EPA list.  The maximum output for pellet stoves is in the 30,000 – 50,000 range, enough to heat all or most of a small or medium house in most climates. “Don’t plan to run the stove all the time at its highest setting,” warns Scott Williamson “or you will be calling someone like me to fix it quicker than you think.”  When we tested six popular pellet stove models, we calculated an output of no more than 21,000 BTUs, far below what the EPA listed and even farther below what manufacturers claimed.
(It is possible to oversize the stove and that can be a problem, but is not nearly as common as under sizing.  For example, the Harman P68 is notorious for being installed in small areas like mobile homes but they gunk up when they aren’t allowed to get up to temperature for a bit before they shutdown,” says Scott Williamson.)
2.      2. Beware of cheaper stoves. There are some good budget wood stoves on the market, but with pellet stoves, you are more likely to get what you pay for than with wood stoves.  “If you want a reliable stove that puts out a lot of heat, we urge customers to ignore pellet stoves under $ 2,500,” says Glenn Robinson.  Scott Williamson generally agrees but has seen some basic stoves like the Pel Pro and Englander hold up pretty well.
3.      3. Check for range of heat output.  Most stoves can put out about 3.5 times more heat at their highest setting, compared to their lowest.  Some stoves have a tiny range, putting out only 1.5 times more heat at their highest setting.  If you live in a more moderate climate, in the early fall and late spring, you may want just a little heat, and still have the capacity for much greater heat output on the coldest days and nights of winter.  All other things being equal in a stove, you may want a stove with a larger range of heat output and you can check the range of all stoves on the EPA listof certified stoves. In our tests, we found that the Enviro M55 insert ran continuously for an impressive 49 hours on its lowest setting with a tested hopper size of 60 pounds and it ran for 22 hours on its higher setting.  However, with a 37-pound hopper, the Englander 25 PDVC only rain for 15 hours on its lower setting and 13 hours on its highest setting, indicating a very low turn down ratio.
4.       4. Understand maintenance requirements. If you don’t clean your stove regularly and have it professionally serviced once a year, don’t expect high BTU output.  Most consumers get subpar performance from stoves and have to repair them more often because they are not maintaining their stoves according to the owner’s manual.  Pellet stoves are not like wood stoves: they have lots of moving parts and need cleaning of the burn pot and inside the stove on weekly, and depending on the stove, a daily basis.  Pellet stoves that are not cleaned regularly can lose 10% or more of their efficiency – and their heat output, and lead to costlier repairs. Understand the daily, weekly and annual maintenance requirements from the start and don’t put them off.  When we tested six popular pellet stoves, we found that the three more expensive ones (Harman, Quadra-Fire and Enviro) could go for a week or more without cleaning the burn pot.  However, the Englander, Ravelli and Piazzetta needed daily burn pot cleanings.

5.       5. Look for cleaner pellet stoves.  Pellet stoves are far cleaner than wood stoves, even if they both have the same particulate matter in grams per hour.  Particulate matter is the tiny stuff that smoke is made out of and pellet stoves should not have any visible smoke after the 3-minute start up.   The average pellet stove used to put out about 2 grams of particulate per hour.  But since the new EPA regulations took effect in 2015, the average pellet stove emits about 1.3 grams per hour that makes pellet stoves more suitable in more densely populated suburban and even urban areas.  Choosing a cleaner pellet stove means a cleaner flue pipe and cleaner air around your and your neighbors’ homes.
6.       6. Beware of stoves without an efficiency on the EPA list. As with BTUs, manufacturers routinely exaggerate the efficiency of their stoves on their websites, so if efficiency and saving money is important to you, check the EPA list of stoves for efficiency ratings.  The problem is some companies still haven’t reported their efficiency to the EPA, so you may only want to purchase a stove that has an efficiency listing on the EPA list.  Pellet stoves with listed efficiencies range from 58 to 87% efficiency, but those not listed could be even lower, drastically increasing your heating costs.
The EPA list includes some slightly exaggerated efficiency numbers, but they are not nearly as exaggerated as manufacturer websites and literature. The EPA used to allow companies to calculate efficiency based on a default of 78% efficiency, even though most pellet stoves are below that, explains Ben Myren, who runs one of the stove test labs approved by the EPA. The result is a 5-10% exaggeration of some stoves on the EPA site, something that the EPA has not publicly acknowledged. (Some incentive and change out programs – Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Oregon – require that the stove have an efficiency listed on the EPA list to get the full rebate.)

Appreciating these six factors are likely to help you make a better decision, but we also encourage consumers to rely on feedback from friends, neighbors and others who own pellet stoves. One site that can be helpful for research is hearth.com.  
A final note of caution is to take advertised hopper size with a grain of salt.  Most manufacturers also exaggerate hopper size.  Of the six models we tested, Harman and Ravelli exaggerated their hopper size by 15 – 18%, while Enviro didn’t exaggerate at all.  Choosing a stove with an advertised hopper size of 50 – 60 pounds can be a good idea, as it means the hopper will likely hold 45 – 55 pounds and you can empty an entire 40 pound bag in it when its low.

Heated Up!

New York adds efficiency requirement to pellet stove incentive program

This month, New York became the first state in the country to set a minimum efficiency requirement in an ongoing pellet stove incentive program.  The State will now only provide its $ 1,500 – $ 2,000 rebates to pellet stoves that are listed as 70% efficiency (HHV) or higher on the EPA’s list of certified stoves.
Two other states use efficiency values and a third is about to announce a similar change in their program.  Oregon has long provided far higher rebates to stoves with higher efficiency listings on the EPA list of wood and pellet stoves.  Massachusetts’ annual change-out program gives an additional rebate if the stove is listed at 65% or higher on the EPA stove list. 
The change in New York’s program, run by the New York State Energy and Research Development Agency (NYSERDA), will limit the number of currently eligible pellet stoves to about 30 models.  NYSERDA also requires that pellet stoves emit no more than 2 grams an hour and that the home does not have access to natural gas, two requirements that the Maryland rebate program also has. 
Last year, NYSERDA gave rebates to help install about 500 pellet stoves and the Maryland program averages about 800 pellet stoves per year.  In both states, this is a significant boost to pellet stove sales.  One of the biggest differences between the two programs is that New York requires the trade-in of an old wood stove, unless you are a low income household, but the Maryland program does not.
Part of the motivation by states and programs to require that stoves have an efficiency listed on the EPA list of stoves is to counter the widespread misinformation provided by manufacturers to consumers.  The Alliance for Green Heat has consistently urged incentive and change out program managers to include efficiency and other best practices in program design. 
This can be particularly problematic with lower income families who may have tried to calculate savings when purchasing a pellet stove, and are relying on manufacturer claims to get one of the higher efficiency stoves.  Incentive and change out programs that give larger amounts to lower income households may be helping those families purchase pellet stoves that are under 60% efficient, saddling them with higher fuel costs for the lifetime of the appliance.
The New York program provides a rebate of $ 2,000 for lower income households compared to $ 1,500 for others, and now protects them from misleading information about efficiencies.  A large portion of the NYSERDA rebate recipients are low-income households.  Both New York and Massachusetts qualify lower income families if they earn less than 80% of median income.  The Massachusetts program was the first to use efficiency in a change out program, giving an additional $ 500 for stoves listed at 65% or higher on the EPA list of certified stoves.  Stoves made by manufacturers who do not disclose actual, tested efficiencies to the public are not eligible for the bonus in Massachusetts or for anything in New York.  Massachusetts also gives a higher rebate amount if you purchase an automated wood stove.
Many retailers welcome the change, as they are often caught between manufacturer efficiency claims and confused consumers.  However, the main hearth industry association representing residential wood and pellet stoves, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, continues to resist efforts to use stove efficiency in incentive and change-out programs.  HPBA provided this statement about the changes in the NYSERDA program: “Unfortunately, there are some very clean, and potentially very efficient, pellet stoves that were certified before efficiency data was required by the new NSPS, but NYSERDA’s program requirements exclude them from consumers’ options.”
Of the approximately 30 pellet stoves that are 2 grams an hour or less and 70% efficiency or more, there are a wide range of more expensive brands carried by specialty hearth stores and very inexpensive ones carried by big box stores.  And more than a third emit no more than 1 gram an hour.  The most efficient pellet stoves on the EPA list, from the Italian Extraflame line, are 87% and 85% efficiency, but do not appear to be on the US market yet.
For consumer tips on how to choose a wood or pellet stove, this websiteoffers advice on stove selection, installation, rebates in your state and how to know when a stove needs replacing.

Heated Up!

All wood and pellet furnaces must be certified by May 15, 2017

One of the loopholes in the new EPA regulations about to close
The cleanest and most efficient
forced air furnace is the Maine
Energy System Auto Pellet Air.
It delivers 89% efficiency.
One of the big loopholes in the new EPA wood and pellet heater regulations is closing this month.  Small forced air furnaces were required to meet new emission regulations in May 2016, but many very small furnaces declared themselves to be large furnaces, giving them until May 2017 to meet the new standards.  As of May 16, 2016, all forced air furnaces, large and small, must emit no more than 0.93 lbs per mmBTU of heat output regardless of whether they are wood or pellet units.
Currently, there are six forced air furnaces that are certified, four of which use wood and two of which use pellets.  The average emissions rate ranges between 0.06 to 0.84 lbs, with the average at 0.411 lbs, less than half the current standard.  However, as of 2020, this class of heaters must meet a far stricter standard of 0.15 lbs/mmBTU.  (This is the subject of litigation by the HPBA.)  Only one of the current six models, the Maine Energy System Auto Pellet Air,  emits less than 0.15 lbs, but it has to be retested using a different test method to comply with the 2020 standards.
Of the six currently on the market, there is a huge efficiency range, from 48% to 89%.  Both ends of the spectrum are listed as pellet heaters.  At the top end is the Maine Energy System’s Auto Pellet Air, which was developed by OkoFEN, a leading pellet boiler company in Austria.  At the bottom end is US Stove’s 8500 multi-fuel furnace.  (US Stove also has a certified cordwood furnace that has lower emissions and higher efficiency than this pellet model.)  The average efficiency of the six
The US Stove 8500 pellet
furnace is the least efficient
certified furnace at 48%, but sells
for less then $ 3,000.

furnaces is 66%.

At the end of May 2017, it will be clear how which forced air furnaces did not get certified.  There are many more coal furnaces on the market today, compared with 3 or 4 years ago, as some companies have added grates and other slight modifications to outdoor wood boilers and furnaces in order to keep them on the market as coal units.  Coal heaters are still not covered by EPA emission regulations, so renaming a wood boiler or furnace a coal boiler or furnace is still a loophole used by some companies.

Heated Up!

Wooden and pellet stove rates increase 3% in wake of new EPA laws


Since the EPA declared stricter emissions rules for wood and pellet stoves, charges increased by an average of 3% more than a two-12 months time period when altered for inflation, based mostly on a evaluation of seventy seven common stove versions. Without having inflation, prices enhanced by an average of four%.

The Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat, an impartial non-revenue targeted on the wooden and pellet heating sector, tracked retail charges for 77 wood and pellet stoves in excess of a two-12 months time period, from February 2015 to February 2017. The EPA introduced new rules on February third and they took effect on May 15, 2015. Even stricter emission boundaries are set for 2020 and the Alliance will continue to monitor charges by way of 2020 and outside of.

We determined seventy seven stoves produced by seven well-liked brand names with varying value points: Jotul, Blaze King, Harman, Quadrafire, Woodstock Soapstone, Hearthstone, US Stove, and Englander.

It is unattainable to explain to how much rules contributed to the 3% cost rise, although every of the 7 makes are likely by way of durations of improved R&ampD as they work toward complying with the 2020 emission limitations. The EPA established a greatest of seven.5 grams an hour in 1990, four.five in 2015 and 2. or two.five grams in 2020. Most stoves currently achieved the 4.5 gram restrict in 2015, but most do not meet up with the 2020 restrictions. It is attainable that some firms are commencing to go those costs alongside to buyers.

There may be steeper cost rises as 2020 ways and organizations have to commence far more intensive R&ampD and certification tests. &nbspHowever, industry is pushing a invoice in Congress to delay the 2020 emission standards to 2023. &nbspThe Fireside, Patio &amp Barbecue Association is also suing the EPA to block the 2020 emission requirements for boilers and furnaces, but not essentially for stoves. &nbspThe monthly bill in Congress is partially created to give the litigation sufficient time to get by means of the courts. &nbsp

We tracked the retail prices of fifty nine wood stoves and 18 pellet stoves making use of the sale or last price of the stove outlined on the retailer’s web site. General, the fifty nine wooden stove retail rates rose an common of four% ($ eighty) or 3% ($ forty five) when accounting for inflation. The pellet stove classification observed a greater average value enhance of 5% ($ 106) or 3% ($ 66) for each stove when accounting for inflation.

  • Four-fifths of the seventy seven wooden and pellet stoves enhanced in value more than the two a long time. Of these, the typical cost enhance was 6% ($ one hundred twenty five) or five% ($ 90) when modifying for inflation.
  • About one-fifth of the seventy seven stoves did not go up in value in between February 2015 and 2017. The vast majority of the Englander and Blaze King models we tracked stayed the exact same cost.
  • Four wood stoves out of seventy seven wooden and pellet stoves — one particular Jotul, two Hearthstone, and one particular US Stove — declined in price tag. The common decrease was 6% ($ 250).

The EPA is needed by law to do an economic regulatory impact evaluation (PDF) and establish if the expenses of the regulation outweigh the positive aspects. The EPA predicted a bit higher retail charges, and as a outcome, a slight decline in demand for new stoves. Nevertheless, on equilibrium they approximated that the general overall health and other benefits vastly outweigh the fees.

Some commentators, members of Congress and editors claimed the EPA laws would make wood stove charges rise sharply and be unaffordable for the average American.

The EPA also is necessary to assess the affect of the regulation on little firms, because much more than 90% of stove producers and stores are little corporations. The U.S. Census Bureau stories that the industry employed fifteen,911 employees in 2011.

Price tag changes by manufacturer and stove type

The wooden stoves with the maximum price tag decreases, Hearthstone’s Bari 8170 and Lima 8150, which declined in value by $ 620 and $ 300 respectively, ended up the priced the highest of any stove on our list in 2015 at $ four,999 and $ 5,299. No pellet stove we tracked declined in price tag in 2017 and the only two pellet stoves did not increase in cost in 2017 (both Englanders priced in between $ one,000 and $ 2,000).

Wooden stove price tag boosts ranged from one% (Hearthstone Castleton 8030 and Craftsbury 8391) to 35% (US Stove’s Big Woodstove). Amid the wooden stoves that increased in cost in between 2015 and 2017, the typical boost was about $ 125 or six% more than the 2015 price. Seven of the 9 pellet stoves that rose in price increased by an even $ one hundred, regardless of their 2015 price tag, which represented a three-4% increase. All five of the Harman pellet stoves, which retailed in between $ 2,999 and $ three,999 retail in 2015, have been outlined $ a hundred larger by the same retailer in 2017.

For the sake of consistency, we only employed stove charges at a single or at most two retailers for every brand name. We employed ultimate or sale charges fairly than “suggested retail price” or “regular price” when offered. The quantity of stoves we selected for every brand name different dependent on the variety of designs available in 2015 and the amount of versions that continued to be bought by that retailer in 2017.

Englander and US Stove experienced some of the most affordable rates stoves we commenced monitoring in 2015, with a median value of about $ 1,000. At about the center ended up the brand names Woodstock Soapstone (median cost of $ two,four hundred), Quadrafire ($ two,550), and Jotul ($ two,seven-hundred). The much more pricey stove brand names integrated our study, dependent on median prices, were Hearthstone ($ 2,900), Blaze King ($ 2,950), and Harman ($ three,000).

Four out of five Blaze King stoves, a few out of 4 Englander wood stoves and all (two) Englander pellet stoves did not increase in cost over these two many years. The sixteen Hearthstone wooden and pellet stoves we tracked declined in value by an typical of one% ($ three.75) per stove, many thanks in excellent part to huge fall in cost for two of the brand’s priciest ($ five,000+) wooden stoves.

As for the manufacturers that increased their charges, Jotul’s 19 wood stoves improved by an average of 3% ($ 79) every. Quadrafire’s and Harman’s wooden and pellet stoves each increased by an average of 4% each and every ($ one hundred and one for Quadrafire, $ 122 for Harman). Harman’s wooden and pellet stoves increased in value by an average of $ 122 for every stove. US Stove and Woodstock Soapstone had the finest common value raises of any brand name at fifteen% each (Woodstock Soapstone has frequent product sales which we did not get into account). US Stove’s stove rates enhanced by an common of $ a hundred and fifty five per stove and Woodstock Soapstone’s enhanced by an regular of $ 408 for each stove.

The EPA regulations had a significantly bigger impact on charges on organizations creating unregulated outdoor wood boilers and unregulated wood furnaces. &nbspPrices for boilers rose at a sharper charge than stoves, although we did not observe individuals costs and cannot offer any estimates.

Heated Up!

Wooden and pellet stove companies boost rankings with the Much better Business Bureau but does it subject?


In the age of Yelp, Facebook, and Angie’s Checklist, thousands and thousands of buyers nevertheless look to the Greater Business Bureau (BBB) for rankings. While the BBB may possibly have lost some of its luster, we have always urged buyers to seek the advice of it when acquiring a new stove.

When the Alliance for Inexperienced Heat reviewed BBB scores for wood and pellet stove companies in 2013, most companies received A scores, but some obtained Bs, one particular obtained a C and one particular acquired an F ranking. As of January 2017, the same businesses all have A+ scores, apart from Fireplace &amp Home Systems, which has a B-.

Does this indicate that stove companies have all grow to be far more trustworthy and reputable or that the BBB has turn out to be less difficult to manipulate? We feel the answer lies far more in the incapability of the BBB to meticulously evaluate every firm. The current scores show the limitations of the aged company ranking product which the BBB was based on. Nevertheless, the BBB still gives some helpful data about stove companies.

Very first of all, appear at which firms are truly accredited by BBB. Only Blaze King, Kuma, and Woodstock Soapstone are accredited, which indicates that they have offered written assurances that they meet up with BBB conditions. That does not essentially indicate a lot, but the Alliance for Green Warmth has independently confirmed that these a few businesses are among the few that buyers can have confidence in to supply correct info on their websites.

Second, previous BBB background is nevertheless essential. US Stove, for illustration, acquired an “F” in 2013, because they experienced “a heritage of violating BBB title and logo plan and falsely mentioned BBB Accreditation (or membership).” (See our 2013 evaluation of BBB stove business scores). The Alliance for Inexperienced Warmth has also highlighted numerous situations of misleading or false advertising and marketing by US Stove, some of which nonetheless proceeds.

It’s crucial to recognize the constraints of the BBB – and to depend on multiple resources. Sadly, Consumer Stories has carried out only a extremely constrained review of pellet stoves and absolutely nothing on wood stoves. The Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat rates some other overview websites here.

We searched the BBB web site for all significant stove firms and located many of them there. We could find only one European stove company (Jotul) and many Canadian ones. For organizations that personal a number of brands, this kind of as Hearth &amp Property Systems, we identified some of their manufacturers, this sort of as Harman and Vermont Castings, but could not discover other folks, these kinds of as Quadra-fire.

Right here is a chart demonstrating BBB scores as of January 2017:

Sequence 1 marks the variety of fixed complaints. Sequence two marks the number of problems that gained no response. Maintain in head that this only tracks the grievances obtained by the BBB, and there are always many consumer grievances not lodged by way of them. This might point out that customers can get much better responsiveness from a stove manufacturer if they do file the criticism with the BBB.

The factors are included up and a letter quality (A as the greatest, F as the lowest) is assigned accordingly. In order to obtain a great rating, the quantity of buyer complaints that are not responded to have to continue to be lower. The BBB takes into thing to consider whether or not the business makes a fast and truthful hard work to repair the issue and solve the complaint. The reaction of the business can indicate the big difference amongst an A and a B score. For instance, as witnessed in the graph, HHT acquired 27 customer problems. Despite this relatively lower variety, HHT nevertheless acquired a B- due to the fact it seemingly was not sufficiently responsive to some of the complaints. Simply click below to read a complete overview of the BBB grading strategy.

Whilst wood stove organizations fare reasonably nicely on BBB, some other merchandise in the hearth business do not. For case in point, Heat Surge, the Amish “miracle heater” that is intensely marketed and is also a exhibitor at HPBA trade shows currently has a B score and hundreds of complaints submitted in opposition to it. The Alliance for Green Warmth has previously created about the business right here.

Heated Up!

Enviro redesigns EF2 pellet stove, raises effectiveness 19%

Enhanced warmth transfer led to significant
enhancement in efficiency with out
any price tag boost of the EF2.

When the EPA commenced submitting genuine efficiencies on its record of qualified stoves, all of sudden customers could see which makes of pellet stoves have been conserving them a lot more cash in gasoline charges and which weren’t. A well-known pellet stove, the EF2, manufactured by a well known brand name, Enviro, turned up at the really bottom of the record at fifty eight% productive, stunning several. The company had been promoting the stove at 87% to shoppers.

Enviro seems to have redesigned the stove in an hard work to avoid the difference of getting the minimum efficient stove on the EPA listing.&nbspIn July of 2016, Enviro examined their new version, the EF2-one, only a 12 months right after testing the older version, and it arrived in at seventy seven%, practically 20% higher than the aged model. Now, due to higher scrutiny, they also advertise to consumers that the stove receives seventy seven% performance. At the very same time they lowered the emissions from 1.eight grams an hour to one.four grams an hour. Their carbon monoxide values also went from 25 grams an hour to 7 grams an hour, a remarkable enhancement.
At seventy seven% effective, the new Enviro EF2-one is 1 of the most successful pellet stoves created by a main North American stove organization. The average pellet stove is very likely to be about 70% effective, but this may possibly rise as companies like Enviro compete to layout increased performance stoves. One particular of Harman’s decrease efficiency stoves, the Advance, analyzed at sixty seven% efficiency. That stove is currently being discontinued, which could be partly due to its minimal effectiveness. (Harman even now promises that the stove is qualified for the federal tax credit rating for stoves that are seventy five% effective or increased.)
The US Stove design 5660 is now one particular of the minimum productive pellet stoves on the industry at sixty two%, but the firm even now suggests that it is eligible for the 75% federal tax credit. St Croix tends to make two pellet stoves, the Hastings and Ashby, that every examined at sixty six% efficiency by EPA-approved test labs. However, the company website statements that the Hastings is 83% efficient and that its “efficiency ratings are confirmed by an impartial lab.” The Hastings owners manual confirms that the independent lab rated the stove at 66% performance.&nbsp The tax credit history is set to expire on Dec. 31, 2016.
The Enviro EF2-1 is also bought by Hudson River Stove Operates beneath the brand names Chatham, Davenport and Kinderhook.&nbsp Even with the lab take a look at showing the stoves are 77% successful, Hudson River Stove Functions proceeds to tell consumers that they are eighty five% productive.&nbsp Not like the makers of automobiles and major appliances, there is nothing at all halting wooden and pellet stove manufacturers – or their retailers – from blatantly deceptive shoppers, as Hudson River Stove Functions does.
The EPA has produced efforts to carry more transparency by demanding producers to post the take a look at lab paperwork on their internet sites. These files show extra specifics about the stove, including its carbon monoxide amounts and emissions results at every single melt away rate. Enviro is a single of the companies that complies with this rule and posts this details so that consumers can see testing data about the EF2-one listed here.

In the November update to the EPA list of licensed stoves, the EPA additional a column for carbon monoxide, as all stoves examined soon after Could 2015 have to take a look at for and report their carbon monoxide emissions stages along with their particulate issue emissions and performance. Nevertheless, the EPA has only enter the CO check final results for two stoves so much: the EF2-one at 7.4 and the England Stove Operates 55-SHPCB120 pellet stove at 16.2.

Heated Up!

Wooden and pellet stoves with true efficiency quantities

The following seventy one wood and pellet stoves have been tested by accredited laboratories for efficiency. Buyers should consider acquiring 1 of these stoves if they want a stove that has a trustworthy effectiveness value. &nbspHowever, with wood stoves, the shown efficiency signifies what shoppers can get if they use dry wooden and give the stove ample air. &nbspWith pellet stoves, the performance described by the lab is a great approximation of the effectiveness the customer can expect. &nbsp

Consumers need to beware that most producer websites put up unreliable and exaggerated efficiencies, besides for a tiny team of businesses. &nbspSome businesses could not put up the efficiencies of their pellet stoves due to the fact they are poorly developed and have efficiencies below sixty five%. Simply click right here for an analysis of stove efficiencies.
How to go through this chart: Some of the Model Names have been shortened to in shape into the structure of this weblog. &nbspTo check out the formal supply of accredited stoves that would include the total product name(s), refer to the record of EPA licensed stoves. &nbspThe emission price is the quantity of grams of particulate issue that make up smoke, per hour. The genuine efficiency refers to a typical of the range of heat outputs that the stove is capable of, calculated using the CSA B415.one-ten, which makes use of the larger heating worth (HHV). Below type of stove, “Cat” refers to catalytic stoves, “Hybrid” refers to stoves that have the two catalytic and non-catalytic engineering, and “Non Cat” refers to non-catalytic stoves.

Manufacturer Title Product Identify Emission Fee G/Hr True Performance&nbsp Kind
Kuma Stove Inc. Sequoia 2.2 eighty four Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries KEJ 1107&nbsp 1.eight eighty two Cat&nbsp
Woodstock Soapstone Best Metal&nbsp 1. 82 Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess PEJ &nbsp two.four 81 Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess 35&nbsp 2.one eighty one Cat&nbsp
Ningbo Hongsheng Comfortbilt HP5 2.five 81 Pellet
Regency (FPI) Regency 3500 one.1 81 Cat&nbsp
Woodstock Soapstone Development Hybrid&nbsp one.three eighty one Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Ashord Chinook&nbsp .eight 80 Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess Insert &nbsp 2 eighty Cat&nbsp
Regency (FPI) LG Flushwood one.eight 80 Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Insert Hybrid&nbsp .six eighty Hybrid&nbsp
Travis Industries Cape Cod&nbsp .five eighty Hybrid&nbsp
England’s Stove Functions 25-SSP01 .56 seventy nine Pellet
Regency (FPI) F5100&nbsp 1.5 seventy nine Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Rockport .eight seventy eight Cat&nbsp
Seraph Industries Genesis 108 2.1 seventy eight Pellet&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Chinook Sirocco&nbsp one.three 77 Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F55 3.5 seventy six Non Cat
Travis Industries Modest Flush &nbsp&nbsp .nine 76 Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Chinook Sirocco&nbsp one. 75 Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The us&nbsp F118 CB three.5 75 Non Cat
Pacific Power Hearth TN20 two.one seventy five Non Cat
Pacific Power Hearth Neo 1.six, Insert three.nine 75 Non Cat
Pacific Energy Fireplace&nbsp Neostone 1.6 three.four seventy five Non Cat&nbsp
Sherwood Industries Enviro 1700l 4.five seventy five Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F600 four.one 74 Non Cat
Jotul North America&nbsp F45 2.3 74 Non Cat
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F500 three.two 74 Non Cat
Pacific Strength Hearth Neo two.5, insert&nbsp two.nine seventy four Non Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Evergreen three.six seventy four Non Cat
Travis Industries 42CVT Wooden .seven 73 Cat&nbsp
American Strength Sys. Baby Country S one seventy three Pellet
Boru Stove Firm Carraig Mor&nbsp three.9 seventy three Non Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F118 Black Bear three 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp Tamarack 4.four 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp F3CBII 3.8 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp F602 CB 3.four seventy three Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F100 Nordic three 73 Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Ashwood 3.5 seventy three Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Scot HT-one 3.five 73 Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Wooden Basic three.3 73 Non Cat
Travis Industries 42CVT Hearth .7 73 Non Cat
Unforgetable Fire Katydid one.9 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp 50TL two.eight seventy two Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Aspen four.one 72 Non Cat
Sherwood Industries Enviro 1200, i&nbsp 3.four seventy two Non Cat&nbsp
American Strength Sys.&nbsp Minor Rascal 1.one 71 Pellet
Blaze King Industries Briarwood II/ninety&nbsp 3.5 seventy one Non Ca&nbsp
Fireplace &amp House Tech. Mt. Vernon AE 1.seven 71 Pellet
Hearth &amp Home Tech. Accentra-2 .62 71 Pellet&nbsp
Jotul North The us&nbsp C550 CB 4.five 71 Non Cat
Jotul North America&nbsp F602 CB&nbsp 3.4 71 Non Cat&nbsp
Even Temp, (St. Croix) Prescott EXP EXL .53 70 Pellet
England’s Stove Functions 15-SSW02 three.five 70 Non Cat
Quadrafire (HHT) Explorer III 2.nine 70 Non Cat
Quadrafire (HHT) Explorer II 2 sixty nine Non Cat
Wiseway Pellet Stove GW1949 one.nine sixty nine Pellet
Jotul North The usa&nbsp Castine F400 3.8 sixty eight Non Cat
US Stove Company 1269E four.2 68 Non Cat
American Power Sys. 3500, 01 &amp 02 1 sixty seven Pellet&nbsp
Fireside &amp House Tech. Advance one.eight 67 Pellet&nbsp
Pacific Energy Fireplace&nbsp FP 25 3.five sixty seven Non Cat
Even Temp (St. Croix) Hastings 1.1 66 Pellet
Even Temp (St. Croix) Ashby-P 1 sixty six Pellet&nbsp
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F370 2.6 66 Non Cat
Enjoyable Hearth, GHP&nbsp WS-2720-B 4.five sixty six Non Cat
Pacific Strength Fireplace PF16 3.one sixty five Non Cat&nbsp
US Stove Company 5660E, one.nine sixty two Pellet
Sherwood Industries EF2, Chatham,&nbsp 1.8 fifty eight Pellet

Heated Up!

Photograph Essay of the 2016 Pellet Stove Design Challenge

Patricia Fritz of the NY Office of Wellness and
Dr. Barbara Panessa-Warren, a nano particle skilled
from Brookhaven. &nbspTheir panel was a single of the most appreciated!
Dave Atkins, moderator of the wood stove retrofit panel,
introducing Jeff Hollowell, a retrofit builder.
Stove set up and set-up prior to the celebration. (Norbert Senf)
Marius Wöhler came from Germany to share ordeals of BeReal, a
European&nbspround&nbsprobin tests task&nbspand a multi-yr&nbspEuropean
&nbspUnion funded study of how people in fact use their stoves at home. (AGH)&nbsp
Geoffrey Johnson and the Torrefire Pellet Stove. (BNL)
SUNY Buffalo college students (from left: Kevan Darmawan, Kyle Hinman,
and Steven Widdis) making use of the Testo 320. (BNL)
The VibraStove, invented and
&nbspdesigned by Stephen Spevak.&nbsp
A drawing of what the PELLWOOD, first place winner, by Wittus,
could search like when it goes to marketplace. (Wittus)

Geoffrey Johnson, inventor of the Torrefire stove, with Jytte
&nbspIllerup, a Danish&nbspresearcher and Ricardo Caravahlo, a
Portugese&nbspPh.D. pupil from Denmark. (AGH)

Mark Knaebe, from the US Forest Support and John Crouch,&nbspfrom
HPBA&nbspat the automatic twine wood stove panel. Ben&nbspMyren
&nbspwas&nbsppresenting the VcV valve technologies via telephone. (AGH)&nbsp
The Alliance for Inexperienced Heat staff: Board members Dave Atkins,
Jonathan Kays, and Norbert Senf with AGH President John
Ackerly&nbspin blue and staff member Gabriella McConnel. (AGH)
René Bindig, a member of the initial
area&nbspteam,Wittus – Fire by Design and style.
Craig McKim of Testo, &nbspdiscussing
&nbsp tests methods with the SUNY Buffalo crew. (AGH)
Tom Butcher and Rebecca Trojanowski, biomass tests
&nbspexperts from Brookhaven Nationwide Laboratory. (AGH)
John Ackerly and Gabriella McConnel, of the Alliance for
&nbspGreen Warmth,&nbsppresenting&nbsptwo of the commercial
demonstration stoves. (Norbert Senf)

Invoice Clark of the Osprey Basis (proper) exhibits off the
Mimi Moto, an extremely thoroughly clean pellet fired cook dinner stove
that he distributes in Africa. (AGH)

Norbert Senf of the Masonry Heater
Affiliation presenting results on PM
&nbsprepeatability testing. (AGH)
Judges conference ahead of the Closing Ceremony. &nbspFrom the remaining:
&nbspRebecca Trojanowski, Mark Knaebe, Tom Butcher, Ray
Albrecht, Ellen Burkhard and Phil Hopke. (Norbert Senf)&nbsp
Stephen Spevak, inventor of the VibraStove, explaining
&nbsphis design and style to the learners of SUNY Buffalo. &nbsp(AGH)
Staff Wittus – Fireplace by Layout, seconds right after listening to
the information that they gained very first place. (AGH)
Rebecca Trojanowski, Craig McKim, Geoffrey Johnson,
and Mark&nbspKnaebe admiring&nbspthe testo design able of
measuring PM. (Norbert Senf)
Scott Williamson, Pelletstoveservice.com,
touching on&nbspthe greatest and worst of
&nbspinnovation&nbspin the pellet stove industry. (AGH)
Jock Gill, representing Jerry Whitfield,
talking about the heritage of pellet stoves
and the potential of biochar. (AGH)
Dr. Joseph Mollendorf, advisor to the SUNY Buffalo team,
&nbspspeaking on the automation and controls
&nbsphis students are doing work on. (Norbert Senf)
Adam Baumgart-Getz of EPA with Geoffrey
Johnson and the Torrefire stove,&nbspwhich
&nbspburns torrefied wood pellets. (AGH)
2nd and initial area teams congratulating every single other
(From still left: Vance Hirst Sr., Vance Hirst Jr., and
Vance Hirst III of Group Seraph&nbspand Niels Wittus and
&nbspRené Bindig of Crew Wittus – Fireplace by Style) (AGH)
Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat personnel (correct) congratulating Niels Wittus and
&nbspRené Bindig, who received first area at the 2016 Pellet Stove Style Challenge.

Heated Up!

Wittus and Seraph acquire Pellet Stove Layout Challenge

Rene Bindig and Niels Wittus,
designers of the Pellwood stove.
A German designed Wittus stove that is dispersed by a New York company, and a stove created by Seraph Industries, the smallest U.S. pellet stove manufacture, gained very first and next spot in the 2016 Pellet Stove Design and style Challenge.&nbsp
This was the 3rd Stove Style Obstaclemarketing innovation in wood and pellet heating to assist buyers minimize fossil heating fuels with appliances that burn up considerably cleaner and far more proficiently than common stoves.
The Wittus Pellwood stove is an really modern prototype that can burn up each pellets and cordwood, bringing innovative technologies from basement furnaces up into the living room to accomplish quite reduced emissions of significantly less than fifty percent a gram for every hour. &nbspThe next place stove, Seraph’s Phoenix F25i, is practically ready for certification testing.&nbsp It also reached a quite clean burn up, persistently beneath 1 g/hr. and has modern characteristics to assist and inspire the client to maintain the stove working well.
The Seraph group with AGH President
John Ackerly (proper).

Other stoves highlighted really modern patterns, which includes the futuristic searching, radiant warmth Torrefire stove with a glass burn up pot. In addition, the gravity fed Vibrastove, with a melt away plate instead of pot, employed only one tiny admirer and made its personal electrical power for off-grid use.

The Section of Energy’s Brookhaven Nationwide Lab hosted the function. The Lab carried out in depth tests of the opposition stoves and will offer valuable data for the EPA, business and other stakeholders about the strengths and weaknesses of tests protocols.&nbsp Each stove was examined 3 instances, to see if the stove operated persistently or regardless of whether the screening protocol could direct to variable benefits.
&nbsp

The Torrefire pellet stove.

“Designing a very inexpensive, high carrying out pellet stove should not be rocket science,” stated Dr. Tom Butcher, Head of the Power Resources Division at Brookhaven National Laboratory. “But in some techniques its tougher than rocket science due to the fact reliable gasoline combustion is extremely challenging to design for and check,” he mentioned.&nbsp “What helps make this competitors wonderful is the new concepts from the competing teams and the spirit of collaboration.”
Pellet stoves are extensively seen as a modern, cleaner, and a consumer-friendlier substitute to twine wood stoves.&nbsp A lot more states and applications are beginning to give more substantial rebates and incentives for pellet stoves than cord wooden stoves, and are starting to target on the stricter emission specifications that will consider influence in 2020.&nbsp This Style Obstacle showed that the 2020 expectations for particulate issue would not be hard for pellet stoves to achieve, but that numerous pellet stoves have mediocre efficiencies.
Steve Spevak, designer of the
Vibrastove and Dr. Tom Butcher
(right) throughout testing.
The Pellet Stove Design Problem is a partnership in between numerous organizations and organizations that are interested in checking out the prospective of technology to satisfy a increasing need for renewable strength.&nbsp The principal funder, &nbspthe New York State Strength Investigation and Advancement Authority (NYSERDA), operates Renewable Warmth New York, a multi-layered incentive software for pellet heating equipment at the residential, commercial and industrial scale.&nbsp Other partnerscontain the United States Forest Service, Brookhaven Nationwide Lab and point out agencies from Massachusetts and Washington, alongside with major specialists from Clarkson College, the Masonry Heater Affiliation and the Osprey Foundation.
The Design and style Problem brought virtually a hundred college students, stove builders, backyard inventors, &nbsplecturers, regulators and authorities with each other to talk about and discussion the condition of the pellet stove engineering, indoor and outdoor air top quality problems and deployment approaches. &nbspOf distinct notice had been a few college teams that are designing stoves from engineering departments at SUNY Buffalo, SUNY Stony Brook and the University of Maryland.&nbsp The speakersincorporated Adam Baumgart-Getz from the EPA, Marius Wohler from the European BeReal initiative, nanoparticle skilled Dr. Barbara Panessa-Warren and scores of other people.&nbsp Presentation abstracts are available along with most of the powerpoint displays.
Marius Wohler, a single of the European
presenters, describing the BeReal survey
and tests, foremost to new screening
protocols in Europe.

&nbspThe occasion coordinator, the Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat, is discovering a return to sophisticated twine wood stove technologies and employing the Countrywide Shopping mall in Washington DC yet again as a location in 2017.&nbsp Stakeholders are invited to get in touch with details@forgreenheat.org with enter about the following Design and style Problem.
– – –

The Alliance for Green Warmth promotes modern wood and pellet heating systems as a reduced-carbon, sustainable and inexpensive energy solution. The Alliance performs to progress stove&nbspinnovation by way of engineering competitions and advises&nbspstate and federal organizations on strengthening plans that require wooden and pellet heating.&nbspFounded in 2009, the Alliance is an impartial non-profit organization based in Takoma Park Maryland.

Heated Up!