First page of the talks archive.

HPBA lawsuit extended again in hopes of renewed talks with EPA

Posted by Earth Stove on June 30, 2017 with No Commentsas , , , , , ,
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit agreed to yet another extension to the lawsuit brought by the Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) and the Pellet Fuel Institute (PFI) against portions of the EPA’s 2015 residential wood heater regulations.
HPBA “hopes to be back in talks with the EPA” said Rachel Feinstein, Government Affairs Manager for HPBA. In the motion requesting the extension, HPBA explained that talks between them and HPBA had broken down under the Obama Administration, but after Trump’s election, HPBA is again “attempting to discuss with DOJ and EPA whether the agencies are willing to engage in further discussions concerning the Rule.”
The Trump Administration has been re-opening rule making on many regulations, but some observers say it will likely be an uphill battle for the hearth industry because the EPA is already contending with many higher profile rules. In addition, even if the EPA were to agree to review parts of the NSPS, the rule would have to go through the notice and comment process that can take 1 to 3 years, at which point there could be a new President and a new head of the EPA.
The EPA can revise regulations at any point, with or without a pending lawsuit. It can commit to a new rule making process on selected parts of the NSPS, but it cannot necessarily guarantee any particular outcome. In cases of voluntary remand, petitioners can also lose their right to appeal.
If the case goes to court in 2018, the outcome partially depends on which panel of judges get appointed to the case and the result could be more unpredictable and potentially more favorable to the groups that intervened in the suit – the American Lung Association, the Clean Air Council and Environment and Human Health. If the case goes to court, the best outcome for HPBA would likely be a settlement agreement that puts part of the NSPS on hold until another rule making is complete.
HPBA and PFI now have until August 25 to file their brief laying out their grievances with the new regulations. HPBA is not challenging the requirement that when tested with cribwood, wood stoves must emit no more than 2 grams an hour as of 2020. This means that all stove manufacturers remain under this deadline to retest their stoves to achieve 2 grams an hour or less under the revised test method. All stoves that tested at 2 or under prior to May 15, 2015 still have to retest to be compliant with the 2020 limits. 
HPBA is challenging the requirement that if a stove is voluntarily tested with cordwood, it must achieve 2.5 grams per hour or less. HPBA asserts that since there is not yet an approved test method, it was premature for the EPA to set an emission limit. HPBA is also challenging emission limits for wood and pellet boilers and furnaces.

Heated Up!

Non-public talks yield consensus on key problems in EPA wooden heater restrictions

Posted by Earth Stove on September 5, 2014 with No Commentsas , , , , , , ,
In July, three gentlemen fulfilled in Canada for delicate, private meetings to see if they could achieve settlement on important sections of the proposed EPA wood heater rules.&nbsp Two represented regional air high quality agencies and a single represented the wood stove and boiler business.&nbsp They were ready to compromise on many troubles, but have been too far aside to attain any arrangement on a lot of other people.&nbsp Much more than a thirty day period later on, right after consulting with their associates, they flew to Washington and presented their consensus positions to EPA Performing Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe.
The a few folks had been Arthur Marin of the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Administration

Arthur Marin, Govt Director of
NESCAUM.

(NESCAUM), Dan Johnson of Western States Air Assets Council (WESTAR) and Jack Goldman of the Hearth, Patio &amp Barbecue Affiliation (HPBA).&nbsp The meeting arose from initiatives by the air organizations and it was agreed that only the principals of every institution would get part in the experience-to-experience conferences as they had been under a tight timeline and needed to maintain the discussions high-stage.&nbsp

The EPA was not component of these conversations nor present, and is below no obligation to adopt any of the consensus positions. However, it is expected that the agency is very likely to adopt a lot of, if not almost all of them.
Most of the regions of settlement ended up around offer-through, grandfathering, certification extension and cordwood tests timelines.&nbsp There was no point out of emission ranges in the document.&nbsp The EPA will put up the 3-website page consensus document in the official report shortly.
Jack Goldman, CEO of HPBA
The positions replicate an effort by the a few establishments to achieve consensus but do not always replicate the positions of all the groups’ users.&nbsp Some manufacturers come to feel that the HPBA has not represented them aggressively sufficient, and the consensus positions offer with every single technological innovation really otherwise.&nbsp For illustration, the consensus position is toughest on outdoor boilers as it does not advise any grandfathering or offer-by means of of unqualified boilers.&nbsp The situation on exempt wooden stoves is much more lenient: a a single-yr offer-via.&nbsp Even much more lenient is the placement on unregulated indoor warm air furnaces, which would get a 1-yr extension for manufacturing and an added sell-by way of year, for a whole of two a long time.

Janet McCabe, EPA Performing Assistant
Administrator of the Office of
Air and&nbspRadiation

The other major region of arrangement is that the swap to cordwood tests for certification must occur, but it is not possible to put into action right away.&nbsp Both sides agree that the EPA should move in that direction but a obviously described check method and a far more sturdy databases of cordwood testing is required.&nbsp However, the consensus paper is silent on the drawn out ASTM cord wooden fueling protocol method and alternatively proposes that a cordwood protocol be designed by a working team established by the EPA under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). This would be the protocol utilized to develop the database of emissions from cordwood screening.&nbsp It is unclear if this protocol could capture commence-up emissions, or how it would greater represent genuine world emission profiles in consumers’ homes.

The consensus positions produced no point out of pellet stoves, hangtags or a lot of other contentious problems.&nbsp Typically, concerns have been not described in the document since they ended up not integrated in the discussions.&nbsp For case in point, the concern of client hangtags, which sector opposed in their comments, was reportedly not raised by possibly facet.

An additional quite significant consensus placement is that all boilers that are qualified by New York (and tested by EPA methods) &nbspon the powerful day of the rule will have their certifications extended for 5 many years.&nbsp This might indicate that producers will not have to bear the time and price of retesting any of their current units for a five year period of time and as an alternative emphasis their efforts on redesigning cleaner stoves. &nbspVirtually all the exempt and unregulated pellet stoves are previously likely by means of the certification method and several wooden stoves are utilizing the “K record” to get new five calendar year certifications. &nbspThese new certifications and “freshening up” of existing ones would have offered most stoves certifications up to four years into the new rule.

If the EPA adopts these tips, it would supply aid to most manufacturers and merchants.&nbsp Even so, the EPA could nonetheless established Phase two requirements, which would take effect in 2020, as reduced as 1.three grams for each hour for wooden and pellet stoves.&nbsp Many observers feel that the EPA is not probably to require this kind of a low emission degree and some in industry say they would be relieved if the EPA settled at 3 grams for every hour.

The key positions of agreement are outlined underneath.&nbsp Preserve in mind that these agreements, if adopted by the EPA, would begin on the efficient day of the regulation, which will most likely be in May possibly of 2015:

one. Woodstoves:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Unregulated and exempt stoves cannot be made.
b)&nbsp&nbsp &nbspRetail revenue of all exempt and qualified stoves (up to seven.5 g/hr for non-cat stoves) cam keep on for one particular yr.
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Certification of stoves that meet Sept 1 stages (proposed at 4.five g/hr) will be prolonged for 5 many years or until Phase two emissions requirements take influence.
2. Hydronic Heaters (indoor and out of doors):
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Only New York certified heaters may possibly be made.
b)&nbsp&nbsp Retail product sales of boilers that are not EPA Phase 2 experienced – and accredited by New York – are not authorized. (New York&nbspneeds a thorough regulatory evaluation procedure for certification.)
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Designs analyzed to EPA’s voluntary plan&nbspandlicensed by New York will be considered accredited for five years.
3. Warm Air Furnaces:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Supply a one-year extension to continue production unregulated furnaces.
b)&nbsp&nbsp Retail revenue might be allowed for a single year over and above the effective day.
four. Cord wood:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp The transition to twine wooden screening to certify new heaters should be executed&nbspfor Phase 2 but will require a sturdy database and EPA accepted strategy.

five. Oversight of Labs:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Labs will supply thirty times recognize of testing to states to let for federal and state accessibility to witness emission tests.
b)&nbsp&nbsp All certification info associated to emissions should be publicly offered.
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Provide states with partial delegation of authority more than some enforcement and compliance concerns and prohibit them from action on other issues.

The previously mentioned summary does not capture all the element and nuance of these 5 areas of consensus.&nbsp Please refer to the original “Consensus Positions” for specific language that was agreed upon by HPBA, NESCAUM and WESTAR.

“We commend NESCAUM, WESTAR and HPBA for enterprise this crucial work and for their willingness to all make sizeable compromises,” stated John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Eco-friendly Warmth. &nbsp”We urge the EPA to adopt these suggestions in the NSPS and to provide the enforcement to quickly shut any loopholes that might emerge after implementation,” Ackerly ongoing.

The consensus positions may possibly give producers and merchants far more certainty about what they can construct and distribute in the months foremost up to the promulgation.&nbsp It is also achievable that the EPA has presented some assurance to sector about the probability of some of these provisions.&nbsp The EPA might have previously made a decision some of what was contained in the Consensus Place paper.&nbsp For instance, it is noted that the EPA had made a decision not to use cordwood for certification tests in 2015 months prior to the meetings between industry and air companies.&nbsp
It is most likely that most key conclusions on the NSPS have presently been manufactured or are near to last as the ultimate draft of the NSPS will be submitted to the Business office of Spending budget and Management in October.&nbsp Even the tips in the Consensus paper had been late for thought by the EPA.
This consensus paper might not make litigation considerably less probably, but it could decrease the quantity of issues that are probably to be litigated.&nbsp Longer offer-by means of intervals, for instance, in contrast to the extremely short types in the proposed NSPS, will lessen economic impacts on numerous little businesses, making the small enterprise issue much more challenging to litigate. &nbspFurther, this work in between air companies and the sector trade team that had been important protagonists throughout much of the discussion all around the proposal propose a a lot more collaborative connection can be forged amongst these parties to aid apply a new NSPS.

NESCAUM is an association of the 8 northeastern states, such as New Jersey, New York and the New England States.&nbsp On NSPS issues, Maine is not getting represented by NESCAUM and is taking far more pro-industry positions.&nbsp WESTAR now signifies fifteen states, from Alaska to New Mexico.&nbsp People states represent an even wider selection of the political spectrum than people in NESCAUM, but none have produced the open crack with their association that Maine has. &nbsp

Heated Up!