The Shifting Experience of Wood Stove Change-out Packages

Posted by Earth Stove on November 27, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , ,
Online Useful resource Center released to aid software professionals &amp buyers
States and counties are progressively seeking to wood stove adjust out applications to inspire people to give up previous, polluting wooden stoves for cleaner options.&nbsp In 2016, there ended up 34 stove adjust-out programs. The average incentive was about $ 900 to change and outdated wooden stove with a new 1, $ 1,300 for a pellet stove, $ one,500 for organic fuel stove and $ one,900 for a warmth pump.

Traits in 2016 alter-outs consist of much more plans only allowing old wooden stoves to be changed by pellet, gas or electric powered appliances more bounty applications that spend for decommissioning the two old and newer wood stoves much more packages necessitating or considering reduce particulate subject requirements for qualified stoves and enhanced documentation for stove retailers and program professionals.
Stove alter-out plans are typically in comparison to “cash-for-clunkers,” the $ three billion plan in 2009 to get more mature, far more polluting automobiles off the highway.&nbsp That system grew to become more controversial as software performance knowledge was evaluated. Stove alter-outs are also usually criticized for not delivering sufficient benefit for every greenback invested.&nbsp This On the web Stove Adjust-out Resource Center strives to support optimize advantages for nearby air top quality, collaborating households and the makers of cleaner, far more successful heating appliances.
This Useful resource Center was also developed to be a source for a nationwide adjust-out fund, like the federal diesel software to substitute older diesel engines. Several customers of Congress had been working on federal funding for a stove adjust-out fund and it is now unclear if that aim may be more tough under a Trump Administration.
“Stove modify-out applications are a wonderful tool for communities to decrease abnormal wooden smoke pollution but a lot of programs underperform,” explained John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Inexperienced Heat.&nbsp “Best techniques created by revolutionary alter-out professionals need to be built-in into much more packages,” he extra.
Crucial elements of the On the web Resource Middle for Wooden Stove Change-outs consist of:
  • &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp&nbsp An in-depth examination of all 2016 alter-out packages
  • &nbsp &nbsp &nbspA zip code research feature for shoppers to locate change-out and incentive programs in their region (coming soon),
  • &nbsp &nbsp &nbspten Best Techniques for alter-out applications,
  • &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp&nbspTips for Homeowners, to navigate the approach of getting a wooden stove and keep expenses down.
  • &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbspSuggested educational movies
This On the web Resource Center is the most comprehensive summary of modify-out plans in the US with details about their budgets, eligibility demands and progressive characteristics.&nbsp It is primarily based on substantial analysis of every modify-out program and interviews with scores of adjust-out professionals, stove merchants and specialists. The Resource Center is an ongoing task that welcomes enter and corrections from all stakeholders.&nbsp Please send comments to info@forgreenheat.org.

This On the web Resource Middle was supported in portion by the Osprey Foundation. &nbspContent for the Source Centre was written by Melissa Bollman and John Ackerly, employees at the Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat. &nbspThe Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat is an unbiased, non-profit group that promotes cleaner and more efficient wood and pellet heating.

Heated Up!

Enviro redesigns EF2 pellet stove, raises effectiveness 19%

Posted by Earth Stove on November 25, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , ,
Enhanced warmth transfer led to significant
enhancement in efficiency with out
any price tag boost of the EF2.

When the EPA commenced submitting genuine efficiencies on its record of qualified stoves, all of sudden customers could see which makes of pellet stoves have been conserving them a lot more cash in gasoline charges and which weren’t. A well-known pellet stove, the EF2, manufactured by a well known brand name, Enviro, turned up at the really bottom of the record at fifty eight% productive, stunning several. The company had been promoting the stove at 87% to shoppers.

Enviro seems to have redesigned the stove in an hard work to avoid the difference of getting the minimum efficient stove on the EPA listing.&nbspIn July of 2016, Enviro examined their new version, the EF2-one, only a 12 months right after testing the older version, and it arrived in at seventy seven%, practically 20% higher than the aged model. Now, due to higher scrutiny, they also advertise to consumers that the stove receives seventy seven% performance. At the very same time they lowered the emissions from 1.eight grams an hour to one.four grams an hour. Their carbon monoxide values also went from 25 grams an hour to 7 grams an hour, a remarkable enhancement.
At seventy seven% effective, the new Enviro EF2-one is 1 of the most successful pellet stoves created by a main North American stove organization. The average pellet stove is very likely to be about 70% effective, but this may possibly rise as companies like Enviro compete to layout increased performance stoves. One particular of Harman’s decrease efficiency stoves, the Advance, analyzed at sixty seven% efficiency. That stove is currently being discontinued, which could be partly due to its minimal effectiveness. (Harman even now promises that the stove is qualified for the federal tax credit rating for stoves that are seventy five% effective or increased.)
The US Stove design 5660 is now one particular of the minimum productive pellet stoves on the industry at sixty two%, but the firm even now suggests that it is eligible for the 75% federal tax credit. St Croix tends to make two pellet stoves, the Hastings and Ashby, that every examined at sixty six% efficiency by EPA-approved test labs. However, the company website statements that the Hastings is 83% efficient and that its “efficiency ratings are confirmed by an impartial lab.” The Hastings owners manual confirms that the independent lab rated the stove at 66% performance.&nbsp The tax credit history is set to expire on Dec. 31, 2016.
The Enviro EF2-1 is also bought by Hudson River Stove Operates beneath the brand names Chatham, Davenport and Kinderhook.&nbsp Even with the lab take a look at showing the stoves are 77% successful, Hudson River Stove Functions proceeds to tell consumers that they are eighty five% productive.&nbsp Not like the makers of automobiles and major appliances, there is nothing at all halting wooden and pellet stove manufacturers – or their retailers – from blatantly deceptive shoppers, as Hudson River Stove Functions does.
The EPA has produced efforts to carry more transparency by demanding producers to post the take a look at lab paperwork on their internet sites. These files show extra specifics about the stove, including its carbon monoxide amounts and emissions results at every single melt away rate. Enviro is a single of the companies that complies with this rule and posts this details so that consumers can see testing data about the EF2-one listed here.

In the November update to the EPA list of licensed stoves, the EPA additional a column for carbon monoxide, as all stoves examined soon after Could 2015 have to take a look at for and report their carbon monoxide emissions stages along with their particulate issue emissions and performance. Nevertheless, the EPA has only enter the CO check final results for two stoves so much: the EF2-one at 7.4 and the England Stove Operates 55-SHPCB120 pellet stove at 16.2.

Heated Up!

A reader responds to the wooden vs. coal discussion

Posted by Earth Stove on November 3, 2016 with No Comments as , , , ,
In our Oct newsletter, we reprinted a column by Cory Hatch from the Jackson Gap Information &amp Information. &nbspWe located it to be a thoughtful piece by a individual grappling with energy alternatives and making an attempt to pretty weigh their costs and positive aspects. &nbspWe received a great deal of positive comments about the write-up but one reader, a previous professor of thermodynamics believed it was critical ample to clarify anything the writer said.
The column produced numerous great details, and concluded:
“Right after you factor in the strength and connected emissions it takes to extract, refine and&nbsptransport fossil fuels, wooden begins to seem quite excellent once again. If you harvest trees close to home, firewood is reasonably effective and renewable, even if storing that carbon once again takes some time. Sadly, woodstoves have neighborhood impacts, as well. Chimney smoke includes particulates, nitrogen oxides and other gasses that can degrade air good quality and cause well being difficulties, particularly for individuals with respiratory or cardiovascular condition.”
The author also noted: “according to the Sierra Club, burning coal for electric power is only about 35 per cent successful, whereas a contemporary wood stove is about seventy five %.”
Professor Gael Ulrich took concern with that:
” It is correct that wooden is superior in that it is renewable and not a fossil gas, and it does not have sulfur or other aspects that can be problems in coal stack emissions. &nbspBut his assertion, attributed to the Sierra Club, implying that wooden combustion is 2 times as productive as coal combustion is incorrect. &nbspThe difference is refined and not appreciated by someone with out a background in thermodynamics, but I will try out to make the cause obvious. &nbsp
Changing fuel strength to heat and then to electricity can never be completed with a hundred% efficiency. &nbspEven the most contemporary efficient power vegetation seldom be successful 40%. &nbspHistorically, that basic principle was elucidated by Carnot, and the theoretical maximum feasible is recognized as the Carnot effectiveness. &nbspIn brief, electrical power or “saved work” is a greater sort of strength than heat. &nbspConverting “heat” to “work” constantly signifies an vitality decline manifest as “waste heat.”&nbsp
Coal electrical power plants possibly do not do a lot much better that 35% as recommended, but wood-fired&nbspelectricgenerators&nbspare even less productive (for factors that would call for much more rationalization). &nbspConverting the vitality articles of coal to heat can, on the other hand, be carried out with high effectiveness, matching or exceeding that of biomass combustors. &nbsp
Thus, the assertion as worded in Hatch’s column is misleading. &nbspHis arguments relating to international warming, and many others. are okay. &nbsp
I believed you might be fascinated in the error in case someone else has not presently referred to as it to your focus.”
Periodically we publish substantive remarks such as this 1 on our website. Scores of shorter remarks are left on our Facebook internet site. &nbspIf you have a longer substantive comment, we are unable to guarantee to publish it but please do not be reluctant to ship to information@forgreenheat.org.

Heated Up!

HHT and Ravelli concur to launch performance for 5 stoves

Posted by Earth Stove on October 5, 2016 with No Comments as , , , ,
In reaction to a Independence of Information Act request filed by the Alliance for Inexperienced Warmth, Fireside &amp Residence Technologies (HHT) and Ravelli unveiled real effectiveness figures for many of their common pellet stove models.&nbsp Efficiencies ranged from fifty six% to 76%.
Wooden and pellet stoves certified after May 2015 must take a look at for and disclose their performance to consumers, as necessary by new EPA restrictions. Prior to these restrictions, stove producers claimed that any accessible performance information was private and they usually did not give it to consumers.&nbsp Nevertheless, several organizations provided the performance information to the EPA as element of the certification process.&nbsp
The Alliance for Environmentally friendly Warmth, based on its legal counsel, argued that the EPA could not keep effectiveness knowledge it gathered prior to May possibly 2015 private since it was based mostly on emission knowledge, and emissions data can’t be private.&nbsp In July 2015 the EPA declined to launch the efficiencies to the Alliance, in keeping with its longstanding apply that they would hold all data private if it was submitted as Private Business Details (CBI). &nbsp
At first, the Alliance experienced questioned for the weighted typical efficiency as nicely as the effectiveness from each and every of the 4 burn charges that labs use to take a look at stoves.&nbsp The Alliance agreed to drop the ask for for the individual burn price efficiencies and only request the average.&nbsp Primarily based on that adjust, HHT and Ravelli agreed to allow the EPA to launch their effectiveness figures to the Alliance with some conditions.
The EPA provided a closing reaction with a data sheet (pdf) hooked up.&nbsp The performance figures (HHV based on B415.1) from that knowledge sheet are:
Organization&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Model&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Effectiveness
HHT&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Accentra 52i insert&nbsp &nbsp seventy six%
HHT &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Mt Vernon E2&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp seventy five%
HHT&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Mt Vernon AE&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspseventy one%
Ravelli&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp RV100&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp70%
Ravelli&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp RV80&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspfifty six%
The Alliance asked for effectiveness data for these certain models, together with numerous other folks, due to the fact we have been in the process of independently tests a assortment of pellet stoves.&nbsp The Alliance was also attempting to encourage the EPA to change their coverage and disclose all effectiveness knowledge, even if that performance information had been marked as Private Organization Details.&nbsp The Alliance argued &nbsp&nbsp
The Ravelli RV80 was tested at
fifty six% efficiency by a EPA
accredited test lab.

that performance was of these kinds of standard significance to shoppers and that maintaining it confidential served no valuable goal. That try was unsuccessful. &nbspThe Alliance is not appealing.

The 5 freshly unveiled real effectiveness figures are not incorporated on the EPA’s record of qualified stoves, the place about 20% of the stoves have real efficiencies outlined. &nbspExcept for a single of the Ravelli’s, these five stoves all have about average or above common efficiencies.&nbsp&nbsp The Ravelli RV80 is only fifty six% successful.&nbsp Nearly all stoves assert to be seventy five% successful to be qualified for the $ three hundred federal tax credit, and EPA listing or disclosure that reveals the stove is not even 60% successful does not appear to deter companies from continuing to claim eligibility for the tax credit rating.&nbsp &nbsp

Heated Up!

Downdraft Wooden Stoves: Consumers Beware

Posted by Earth Stove on September 21, 2016 with No Comments as , , , ,

The simplicity of the non-catalytic stove helps make it the most well-known sort of stove in North The united states by much.&nbsp With most non-cats, the buyer only requirements to fret about a one lever to regulate the quantity of air in the firebox.&nbsp But some shoppers unwittingly buy a extremely unique sort of non-cat, a &nbspdowndraft stove, and often regret it.

These days there are only a handful of downdraft stoves on the marketplace, Most have been pushed apart by non-cat stoves with air tubes that reburn smoke as it exits the firebox.&nbsp The downdraft stove works with a next lever that engages a by-move damper which forces the smoke down into a chamber the place heat can reburn it ahead of it goes again up the chimney.&nbsp
Nearly all stoves on the industry today do not consider to get smoke to go down, but rather try out to reburn it on its journey upward with secondary air launched by way of holes in tubes or in higher wall of stove – or with a catalyst. Hybrids use the two tubes to inject for secondary air and a catalyst. &nbsp(Click below for a lot more on cat, non-cat and hybrid stoves.)
Downdraft stoves tend to be finicky, require to be really sizzling to function appropriately and are far more inclined to leaking smoke into the property.&nbsp Most buyers must not take into account them until they know what they are obtaining into and are ready to be a lot a lot more engaged with their stove.&nbsp The same can be said about catalytic stoves.&nbsp Customers should comprehend that they need to know how to use the next lever that engages the by-move damper and from time to time check the catalyst, and exchange it when it requirements replacing.

Stove modify out applications, that switch out outdated stoves with new, EPA certified types could want to exclude downdraft stoves from eligible replacements as they could be the most difficult class of stove to operate regularly without having seen smoke.

The downdraft stove turned common in the 1980s when Vermont Castings employed it to extract much more heat from a stove and to support go the emission testing required by the state of Oregon, and later by the EPA. &nbspThe by-go damper aided sluggish down the hearth, create turbulence, and extract a lot more warmth from the very hot gases ahead of they went up the stack. The Resolute Acclaim, a single of the most well-known wooden stoves of the final century, was a downdraft stove.&nbsp It clocked in at 3.4 grams for each hour and ongoing selling via the 2000s, but has given that been taken out of creation.
Today, there are a handful of downdraft stoves on the industry, including the Lopi Leyden and the Avalon Arbor (which are evidently the same stove).&nbsp The&nbspHarman TL300 is also a downdrafter and Vermont Castings still has one particular or two.
The authentic Frankin stove
was a downdraft with no
front door and typically
created for a smoky house.

Downdraft stoves have existed for centuries in numerous patterns. The authentic stove invented by Ben Franklin also experienced a downdraft included into the layout, and it is a single of the causes that the stove was so finicky and disfavored by the greater part of buyers. Franklin himself admitted that the stove was tough to function and took lots of interest and was not anything that “could be left to the servants.” &nbspLater iterations of the Franklin stove included a doorway and most received rid of the downdraft.

Customer feedback
Hearth.com is a leading chat place for wood stove specialists and rookies alike. It consists of a good deal of very good suggestions on downdraft stoves:
– “The creosote smell when closing the bypass is not an uncommon situation with the downdrafting stoves. I’ve seen Harman stove owners complain with it as nicely. I will often get it. Occasionally not. It is not noxious, just a faint odor that I can do with out. CO keep track of pays it no head.”
– “I want a team of downdrafters could get their heads collectively on this a single and figure out what is likely on. It really is a frequent problem to different stoves. Possibly that box complete of smoke is permitting some escape at the joints.”
– “I’ve smelled it when the draft was robust, but typically it comes when the flue has begun to awesome down a little. Loading lid was a key suspect, but I regasketed it and sat a solid iron pot on there.”
– “Downdraft stoves are notoriously fussy and demanding of a robust draft.”
– “The Leyden has gone through a handful of modifications of the several years. There are some ports that require complete cleaning “Regular monthly” as properly and they are not effortless to get to. Make certain these ports are cleaned frequently. Your guide shows how to do this properly.”
– “These stoves have to be critically very hot to perform.”
– “I occasionally get a bit of smoke when loading. Mainly due to the fact I am way too lazy to do it proper. Once more, operate the stove as developed and if it will not perform, get a appear at the flue, check out for ash buildup, etc.. … your flue style is gonna be a tough one.”
– “I don’t want to melt your stove down, but my hunch is that you might be not acquiring it sizzling enough on a three-four” coal mattress.”
– “Is the wooden really properly seasoned? That is very important with this stove as is a good draft.”
– “I would try working your stove leading temperature a small larger (650-seven-hundred) prior to you go to secondary melt away, generally you get some fall in stovetop temperature when you near the damper.”
– “The Lopi Leyden is a extremely problematic stove. You don’t want it, imagine me!”
– “I also propose to consider off the Vermont Castings Resolute and Lopi Leyden. Equally use a various system to obtain a thoroughly clean burn up than the other non-catalytic stoves. The two stoves typically have a steeper understanding curve, can be vulnerable to expensive repairs and are greater suited for entire-time burners which does not look to be your intention.”
– “As other individuals have talked about, the Oakwood (and other downdrafts like Lopi Leyden and specified Vermont Castings types) can be a little bit fussy about dry wood and good draft, requires a little bit a lot more babysitting and for a longer time studying curve, and is not well suited to slower/reduced burns in months like November and April.”
– “You want a stove with tubes in the leading or a catalyst. Avoid stoves that attract smoke down into the back of the stove. For instance: Vermont Castings, some Harman’s and Lopi Leyden.”

Heated Up!

Wooden and pellet stoves with true efficiency quantities

Posted by Earth Stove on June 18, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , ,

The following seventy one wood and pellet stoves have been tested by accredited laboratories for efficiency. Buyers should consider acquiring 1 of these stoves if they want a stove that has a trustworthy effectiveness value. &nbspHowever, with wood stoves, the shown efficiency signifies what shoppers can get if they use dry wooden and give the stove ample air. &nbspWith pellet stoves, the performance described by the lab is a great approximation of the effectiveness the customer can expect. &nbsp

Consumers need to beware that most producer websites put up unreliable and exaggerated efficiencies, besides for a tiny team of businesses. &nbspSome businesses could not put up the efficiencies of their pellet stoves due to the fact they are poorly developed and have efficiencies below sixty five%. Simply click right here for an analysis of stove efficiencies.
How to go through this chart: Some of the Model Names have been shortened to in shape into the structure of this weblog. &nbspTo check out the formal supply of accredited stoves that would include the total product name(s), refer to the record of EPA licensed stoves. &nbspThe emission price is the quantity of grams of particulate issue that make up smoke, per hour. The genuine efficiency refers to a typical of the range of heat outputs that the stove is capable of, calculated using the CSA B415.one-ten, which makes use of the larger heating worth (HHV). Below type of stove, “Cat” refers to catalytic stoves, “Hybrid” refers to stoves that have the two catalytic and non-catalytic engineering, and “Non Cat” refers to non-catalytic stoves.

Manufacturer Title Product Identify Emission Fee G/Hr True Performance&nbsp Kind
Kuma Stove Inc. Sequoia 2.2 eighty four Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries KEJ 1107&nbsp 1.eight eighty two Cat&nbsp
Woodstock Soapstone Best Metal&nbsp 1. 82 Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess PEJ &nbsp two.four 81 Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess 35&nbsp 2.one eighty one Cat&nbsp
Ningbo Hongsheng Comfortbilt HP5 2.five 81 Pellet
Regency (FPI) Regency 3500 one.1 81 Cat&nbsp
Woodstock Soapstone Development Hybrid&nbsp one.three eighty one Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Ashord Chinook&nbsp .eight 80 Cat&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Princess Insert &nbsp 2 eighty Cat&nbsp
Regency (FPI) LG Flushwood one.eight 80 Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Insert Hybrid&nbsp .six eighty Hybrid&nbsp
Travis Industries Cape Cod&nbsp .five eighty Hybrid&nbsp
England’s Stove Functions 25-SSP01 .56 seventy nine Pellet
Regency (FPI) F5100&nbsp 1.5 seventy nine Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Rockport .eight seventy eight Cat&nbsp
Seraph Industries Genesis 108 2.1 seventy eight Pellet&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Chinook Sirocco&nbsp one.three 77 Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F55 3.5 seventy six Non Cat
Travis Industries Modest Flush &nbsp&nbsp .nine 76 Hybrid&nbsp
Blaze King Industries Chinook Sirocco&nbsp one. 75 Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The us&nbsp F118 CB three.5 75 Non Cat
Pacific Power Hearth TN20 two.one seventy five Non Cat
Pacific Power Hearth Neo 1.six, Insert three.nine 75 Non Cat
Pacific Energy Fireplace&nbsp Neostone 1.6 three.four seventy five Non Cat&nbsp
Sherwood Industries Enviro 1700l 4.five seventy five Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F600 four.one 74 Non Cat
Jotul North America&nbsp F45 2.3 74 Non Cat
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F500 three.two 74 Non Cat
Pacific Strength Hearth Neo two.5, insert&nbsp two.nine seventy four Non Cat&nbsp
Travis Industries Evergreen three.six seventy four Non Cat
Travis Industries 42CVT Wooden .seven 73 Cat&nbsp
American Strength Sys. Baby Country S one seventy three Pellet
Boru Stove Firm Carraig Mor&nbsp three.9 seventy three Non Cat&nbsp
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F118 Black Bear three 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp Tamarack 4.four 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp F3CBII 3.8 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp F602 CB 3.four seventy three Non Cat
Jotul North The usa&nbsp F100 Nordic three 73 Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Ashwood 3.5 seventy three Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Scot HT-one 3.five 73 Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Wooden Basic three.3 73 Non Cat
Travis Industries 42CVT Hearth .7 73 Non Cat
Unforgetable Fire Katydid one.9 73 Non Cat
Jotul North The us&nbsp 50TL two.eight seventy two Non Cat
Kuma Stove Inc. Aspen four.one 72 Non Cat
Sherwood Industries Enviro 1200, i&nbsp 3.four seventy two Non Cat&nbsp
American Strength Sys.&nbsp Minor Rascal 1.one 71 Pellet
Blaze King Industries Briarwood II/ninety&nbsp 3.5 seventy one Non Ca&nbsp
Fireplace &amp House Tech. Mt. Vernon AE 1.seven 71 Pellet
Hearth &amp Home Tech. Accentra-2 .62 71 Pellet&nbsp
Jotul North The us&nbsp C550 CB 4.five 71 Non Cat
Jotul North America&nbsp F602 CB&nbsp 3.4 71 Non Cat&nbsp
Even Temp, (St. Croix) Prescott EXP EXL .53 70 Pellet
England’s Stove Functions 15-SSW02 three.five 70 Non Cat
Quadrafire (HHT) Explorer III 2.nine 70 Non Cat
Quadrafire (HHT) Explorer II 2 sixty nine Non Cat
Wiseway Pellet Stove GW1949 one.nine sixty nine Pellet
Jotul North The usa&nbsp Castine F400 3.8 sixty eight Non Cat
US Stove Company 1269E four.2 68 Non Cat
American Power Sys. 3500, 01 &amp 02 1 sixty seven Pellet&nbsp
Fireside &amp House Tech. Advance one.eight 67 Pellet&nbsp
Pacific Energy Fireplace&nbsp FP 25 3.five sixty seven Non Cat
Even Temp (St. Croix) Hastings 1.1 66 Pellet
Even Temp (St. Croix) Ashby-P 1 sixty six Pellet&nbsp
Jotul North The united states&nbsp F370 2.6 66 Non Cat
Enjoyable Hearth, GHP&nbsp WS-2720-B 4.five sixty six Non Cat
Pacific Strength Fireplace PF16 3.one sixty five Non Cat&nbsp
US Stove Company 5660E, one.nine sixty two Pellet
Sherwood Industries EF2, Chatham,&nbsp 1.8 fifty eight Pellet

Heated Up!

Photograph Essay of the 2016 Pellet Stove Design Challenge

Posted by Earth Stove on May 1, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , , ,
Patricia Fritz of the NY Office of Wellness and
Dr. Barbara Panessa-Warren, a nano particle skilled
from Brookhaven. &nbspTheir panel was a single of the most appreciated!
Dave Atkins, moderator of the wood stove retrofit panel,
introducing Jeff Hollowell, a retrofit builder.
Stove set up and set-up prior to the celebration. (Norbert Senf)
Marius Wöhler came from Germany to share ordeals of BeReal, a
European&nbspround&nbsprobin tests task&nbspand a multi-yr&nbspEuropean
&nbspUnion funded study of how people in fact use their stoves at home. (AGH)&nbsp
Geoffrey Johnson and the Torrefire Pellet Stove. (BNL)
SUNY Buffalo college students (from left: Kevan Darmawan, Kyle Hinman,
and Steven Widdis) making use of the Testo 320. (BNL)
The VibraStove, invented and
&nbspdesigned by Stephen Spevak.&nbsp
A drawing of what the PELLWOOD, first place winner, by Wittus,
could search like when it goes to marketplace. (Wittus)

Geoffrey Johnson, inventor of the Torrefire stove, with Jytte
&nbspIllerup, a Danish&nbspresearcher and Ricardo Caravahlo, a
Portugese&nbspPh.D. pupil from Denmark. (AGH)

Mark Knaebe, from the US Forest Support and John Crouch,&nbspfrom
HPBA&nbspat the automatic twine wood stove panel. Ben&nbspMyren
&nbspwas&nbsppresenting the VcV valve technologies via telephone. (AGH)&nbsp
The Alliance for Inexperienced Heat staff: Board members Dave Atkins,
Jonathan Kays, and Norbert Senf with AGH President John
Ackerly&nbspin blue and staff member Gabriella McConnel. (AGH)
René Bindig, a member of the initial
area&nbspteam,Wittus – Fire by Design and style.
Craig McKim of Testo, &nbspdiscussing
&nbsp tests methods with the SUNY Buffalo crew. (AGH)
Tom Butcher and Rebecca Trojanowski, biomass tests
&nbspexperts from Brookhaven Nationwide Laboratory. (AGH)
John Ackerly and Gabriella McConnel, of the Alliance for
&nbspGreen Warmth,&nbsppresenting&nbsptwo of the commercial
demonstration stoves. (Norbert Senf)

Invoice Clark of the Osprey Basis (proper) exhibits off the
Mimi Moto, an extremely thoroughly clean pellet fired cook dinner stove
that he distributes in Africa. (AGH)

Norbert Senf of the Masonry Heater
Affiliation presenting results on PM
&nbsprepeatability testing. (AGH)
Judges conference ahead of the Closing Ceremony. &nbspFrom the remaining:
&nbspRebecca Trojanowski, Mark Knaebe, Tom Butcher, Ray
Albrecht, Ellen Burkhard and Phil Hopke. (Norbert Senf)&nbsp
Stephen Spevak, inventor of the VibraStove, explaining
&nbsphis design and style to the learners of SUNY Buffalo. &nbsp(AGH)
Staff Wittus – Fireplace by Layout, seconds right after listening to
the information that they gained very first place. (AGH)
Rebecca Trojanowski, Craig McKim, Geoffrey Johnson,
and Mark&nbspKnaebe admiring&nbspthe testo design able of
measuring PM. (Norbert Senf)
Scott Williamson, Pelletstoveservice.com,
touching on&nbspthe greatest and worst of
&nbspinnovation&nbspin the pellet stove industry. (AGH)
Jock Gill, representing Jerry Whitfield,
talking about the heritage of pellet stoves
and the potential of biochar. (AGH)
Dr. Joseph Mollendorf, advisor to the SUNY Buffalo team,
&nbspspeaking on the automation and controls
&nbsphis students are doing work on. (Norbert Senf)
Adam Baumgart-Getz of EPA with Geoffrey
Johnson and the Torrefire stove,&nbspwhich
&nbspburns torrefied wood pellets. (AGH)
2nd and initial area teams congratulating every single other
(From still left: Vance Hirst Sr., Vance Hirst Jr., and
Vance Hirst III of Group Seraph&nbspand Niels Wittus and
&nbspRené Bindig of Crew Wittus – Fireplace by Style) (AGH)
Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat personnel (correct) congratulating Niels Wittus and
&nbspRené Bindig, who received first area at the 2016 Pellet Stove Style Challenge.

Heated Up!

Wittus and Seraph acquire Pellet Stove Layout Challenge

Posted by Earth Stove on April 12, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , , ,
Rene Bindig and Niels Wittus,
designers of the Pellwood stove.
A German designed Wittus stove that is dispersed by a New York company, and a stove created by Seraph Industries, the smallest U.S. pellet stove manufacture, gained very first and next spot in the 2016 Pellet Stove Design and style Challenge.&nbsp
This was the 3rd Stove Style Obstaclemarketing innovation in wood and pellet heating to assist buyers minimize fossil heating fuels with appliances that burn up considerably cleaner and far more proficiently than common stoves.
The Wittus Pellwood stove is an really modern prototype that can burn up each pellets and cordwood, bringing innovative technologies from basement furnaces up into the living room to accomplish quite reduced emissions of significantly less than fifty percent a gram for every hour. &nbspThe next place stove, Seraph’s Phoenix F25i, is practically ready for certification testing.&nbsp It also reached a quite clean burn up, persistently beneath 1 g/hr. and has modern characteristics to assist and inspire the client to maintain the stove working well.
The Seraph group with AGH President
John Ackerly (proper).

Other stoves highlighted really modern patterns, which includes the futuristic searching, radiant warmth Torrefire stove with a glass burn up pot. In addition, the gravity fed Vibrastove, with a melt away plate instead of pot, employed only one tiny admirer and made its personal electrical power for off-grid use.

The Section of Energy’s Brookhaven Nationwide Lab hosted the function. The Lab carried out in depth tests of the opposition stoves and will offer valuable data for the EPA, business and other stakeholders about the strengths and weaknesses of tests protocols.&nbsp Each stove was examined 3 instances, to see if the stove operated persistently or regardless of whether the screening protocol could direct to variable benefits.
&nbsp
The Torrefire pellet stove.

“Designing a very inexpensive, high carrying out pellet stove should not be rocket science,” stated Dr. Tom Butcher, Head of the Power Resources Division at Brookhaven National Laboratory. “But in some techniques its tougher than rocket science due to the fact reliable gasoline combustion is extremely challenging to design for and check,” he mentioned.&nbsp “What helps make this competitors wonderful is the new concepts from the competing teams and the spirit of collaboration.”
Pellet stoves are extensively seen as a modern, cleaner, and a consumer-friendlier substitute to twine wood stoves.&nbsp A lot more states and applications are beginning to give more substantial rebates and incentives for pellet stoves than cord wooden stoves, and are starting to target on the stricter emission specifications that will consider influence in 2020.&nbsp This Style Obstacle showed that the 2020 expectations for particulate issue would not be hard for pellet stoves to achieve, but that numerous pellet stoves have mediocre efficiencies.
Steve Spevak, designer of the
Vibrastove and Dr. Tom Butcher
(right) throughout testing.
The Pellet Stove Design Problem is a partnership in between numerous organizations and organizations that are interested in checking out the prospective of technology to satisfy a increasing need for renewable strength.&nbsp The principal funder, &nbspthe New York State Strength Investigation and Advancement Authority (NYSERDA), operates Renewable Warmth New York, a multi-layered incentive software for pellet heating equipment at the residential, commercial and industrial scale.&nbsp Other partnerscontain the United States Forest Service, Brookhaven Nationwide Lab and point out agencies from Massachusetts and Washington, alongside with major specialists from Clarkson College, the Masonry Heater Affiliation and the Osprey Foundation.
The Design and style Problem brought virtually a hundred college students, stove builders, backyard inventors, &nbsplecturers, regulators and authorities with each other to talk about and discussion the condition of the pellet stove engineering, indoor and outdoor air top quality problems and deployment approaches. &nbspOf distinct notice had been a few college teams that are designing stoves from engineering departments at SUNY Buffalo, SUNY Stony Brook and the University of Maryland.&nbsp The speakersincorporated Adam Baumgart-Getz from the EPA, Marius Wohler from the European BeReal initiative, nanoparticle skilled Dr. Barbara Panessa-Warren and scores of other people.&nbsp Presentation abstracts are available along with most of the powerpoint displays.
Marius Wohler, a single of the European
presenters, describing the BeReal survey
and tests, foremost to new screening
protocols in Europe.

&nbspThe occasion coordinator, the Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat, is discovering a return to sophisticated twine wood stove technologies and employing the Countrywide Shopping mall in Washington DC yet again as a location in 2017.&nbsp Stakeholders are invited to get in touch with details@forgreenheat.org with enter about the following Design and style Problem.
– – –

The Alliance for Green Warmth promotes modern wood and pellet heating systems as a reduced-carbon, sustainable and inexpensive energy solution. The Alliance performs to progress stove&nbspinnovation by way of engineering competitions and advises&nbspstate and federal organizations on strengthening plans that require wooden and pellet heating.&nbspFounded in 2009, the Alliance is an impartial non-profit organization based in Takoma Park Maryland.

Heated Up!

Performance of Popular Pellet Stoves

Posted by Earth Stove on April 2, 2016 with No Comments as , , ,
This is an except of a much longer, and more technical paper by Prof. Gael Ulrich’s -“BioCombustion Institute Bulletin #3.” Gael calculated the efficiency of six popular pellet stoves, finding a wide difference.  The highest, the Italian made Piazzetta Sabrina was 76% efficient and the lowest was the Enviro M55 Insert at 51% efficient.  In between were the Ravelli RV80 (62%), Englander PDCV55 (63%), Quadrafire Mt Vernon AE (64%) and Harman Accentra 52i (71%).
He did this by using performance data produced by the Alliance for Green Heat, who tested these 6 stoves over a 30-day period.  The Alliance operated the stoves, often for 24 hours a day, testing them almost every day at various heat output settings and averaging the results. All the stoves were purchased new, without the knowledge of the manufacturers and operated with the same PFI certified pellets.  The Alliance produced an in-depth report about the findings, but we did not report the efficiency values because the instrument we used was a Testo 320, which produces a proprietary European (LHV) number, not the kind of efficiency values that are used and reported in North America. 
Gael’s full paper can be downloaded as a PDF here, which is quite technical.  We reproduced the less technical parts which are accessible to a wider audience. 
One conclusion is that many pellet stoves lack a very simple solution to increasing their efficiencies – larger heat exchangers.  Gael found that “All [the stoves], except the Enviro and Quadrafire, appear capable of adding another 5 to 10 percentage points by increasing heat exchange area to reduce the flue gas temperature.”  This solution may only add $ 100 – $ 200 to the price of a stove but would save consumers far more in fuel costs. 
One thing is clear: more expensive stoves do not necessarily provide consumers with higher efficiency. The Englander is sold by big box hardware stoves for $ 1,100, and is on par or better in efficiency than stoves that sell for $ 3,000 or $ 4,000.  This is significant because the big pellet stove manufactures do not release the actual efficiency of their stoves to consumers and consumers have virtually no way to tell which models are lower or higher efficiency.  The EPA contributed to a myth that pellet stoves have high efficiencies by giving them a default efficiency of 78%.  Emerging data shows the average pellet stove is likely around 70% efficiency, but many big name brands make pellet stoves that have efficiencies in 50s and 60s. This analysis begins to dismantle the lack of transparency in efficiency values that manufacturers have tried to maintain for many years.
Biomass Combustor Efficiency
BioCombustion Institute Bulletin #3
(Gael Ulrich: 16 March 2016)
Abstract
Gael Ulrich was a professor of
Chemical Engineering at the
University of New Hampshire

If flue gas temperature and composition are known, one can calculate the efficiency of a biomass combustor using the so-call “stack loss” technique.  This paper explains in detail why that is possible and how to do it.  Fortuitously, during the preparation of this bulletin, the Alliance for Green Heat published data from their testing of six pellet stoves this past September.[1] Test equipment used in the AGH study delivered composition, temperature, and efficiency numbers.  Investigators declined to report the efficiency numbers for various reasons, although they do mention a range of 60 to 75%. 

Using the AGH temperature and concentration data, I made independent calculations as described in detail herein.  I find one of the six stoves operating at 51% efficiency, three in the low 60s, and the remaining two operating at 71 and 76%.  I also conclude from my analysis that some of these units use “dilution as the solution to pollution.”  If we consider actual emissions in grams per hour or milligrams per MegaJoule of heat delivered instead of parts per million in flue gas, the rating is rearranged with one stove deemed second dirtiest becoming the cleanest and that ranked third cleanest becoming the dirtiest.  Factors that influence efficiency and cleanliness and how to improve these important performance properties are also discussed herein.  
Introduction
As pointed out in BCI Bulletins #1 (Units) and #2 (Emissions), biomass is intrinsically a clean fuel composed primarily of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and ash.  If burned properly, with ash un-entrained, flue gases from biomass can be as clean as those from natural gas and perhaps even cleaner than from oil.  The problem, of course, is that biomass is neither a liquid nor a gas like these fossil fuels.  Burning a solid cleanly and efficiently is much more difficult.  Bulletin #2 dealt with cleanliness and the standards expected.  This one focuses on efficiency and how it can be measured for a biomass burner.
Instruments and software are available to deliver efficiency ratings and other data even to an ignorant user with enough money to buy them. But to use these tools intelligently, one must know how they function and should be able to calculate efficiency separately and from scratch.  This bulletin describes how to do that. 
Fundamentals
Efficiency is a concept that everyone understands, but different people often define it differently.  Let’s solve that problem first.  For simplicity, visualize a biomass combustor as a black box with fuel and air flowing in; flue gases and ash flowing out.[2] … As defined by logic, efficiency is the ratio of useful heat released to fuel energy provided.  Fuel Energy is the Higher Heating Value,[3] a quantity that has been carefully measured over the last couple centuries by scientists for all common fuels. 
For highest efficiency,
1.  Burn with the least amount of excess air possible.
2.  Operate with the lowest feasible flue gas temperature.
3.  Use dry fuel.
Alliance for Green Heat Data
The AGH study ran for a period of 30 days.  Investigators found results that showed little drift with time.  Five of the six stoves operated with more than 200% excess air; beyond maxima considered in Figure 7.  One could derive additional curves for these high air rates just as was done for the lower percentages of excess air, but I chose to extrapolate instead, creating the dashed lines in Figure 9.
Efficiencies for the six AGH pellet stoves as read from Figure 9b are listed in Table 6. 
Table 6.  Calculated efficiencies of pellet stoves studied in the September 2015 Alliance for Green Heat test series.
Stove                O2         % X’s Air           Flue Gas            Efficiency e                             
Brand                 Conc.    (Figure 8)           Temp. (oC)         (Figure 9b)
Enviro               18.7%       800%                        150                        51 %           
Ravelli              16.8%       400%                        195                        62 %           
Englander         16.0%       315%                        222                        63 %           
Quad                  17.4%       480%                        160                        64 %           
Harman             15.0%        245%                        205                        71 %
Piazzetta            13.5%       175%                        203                        76 %
One of the six operated at 51% efficiency, three in the low 60s, and the remaining two operated at 71 and 76%.  These numbers are consistent with the range mentioned in the AGH report. 
Piazzetta achieves superiority through low excess air rate. Enviro, at the other end of the spectrum, would have an even lower efficiency if its flue gas temperature were as high as the others.  All, except Enviro and Quad, appear capable of adding another 5 to 10 percentage points by increasing heat exchange area to reduce the flue gas temperature. 
Emissions
What about Pollution?  The AGH data demonstrate an interesting application of using “dilution as a solution to pollution.”[4]  The Harman emitted flue gases containing about 820 ppm CO while the Enviro emitted 534 ppm.  But the Harman operated with about 240% excess air; the Enviro with 800%.  And, the Harman was 22% more efficient. 
At the same pellet burning rate, the Enviro produces roughly 900/340 or 2.6 times as much flue gas as the Harmon, and its useful heat delivery rate is only 82 percent as great.  Thus, in terms of mass of CO per kJ of delivered heat, a better measure of actual pollution, the Enviro is (2.6/0.82)*(534/820) = 2.1 or about twice as bad as the Harmon.  Based on the data provided, I calculated mg of CO per MJ of useful heat delivered for the six pellet stoves.  Results are listed in Table 7. 
Table 7.  Calculated CO emissions of pellet stoves studied in the September 2015 Alliance for Green Heat test series.  
                                                                                                CO emissions    
 Stove                                                                     (mg/MJ of       (ppm)
Brand       % X’s Air           Efficiency e        (ppm)    heat   normalized**
Enviro               800%                51%                  534       3000     850  (2.7)
Ravelli              400%                62%                  428       1100    365  (1.2)
Englander         320%                62%                  542       1200    387  (1.2)
Quad                  480%                64%                  318         930     318  (1.0)**
Harman              240%                71%                  821       1300     487  (1.5)
Piazzetta            170%                76%                  648         780     370  (1.2)
           
                  *Normalized to Quad as the reference.
                  **Normalized to Quad as the reference using Wikipedia formula. 
In terms of mass per unit of useful heat, the Enviro emits about four times as much CO as the Piazzetta (3000 versus 780 mg/MJ or roughly 130 versus 35 milligrams per hour).
What about non-steady-state?  My analysis assumes the appliance operates at steady state with feed rates and temperatures invariant with time.  This is valid for automatic-feed pellet stoves but not for wood stoves that are fed batch-wise.  There, the burn mode migrates from de-volatilization and combustion of light organics, gradually progressing to char or carbon burn-out.  Fortunately, stage changes are slow relative to combustion kinetics.  At any given time, the analysis described herein can be used to analyze the appliance at that instant.  To more accurately reflect the performance of a batch-fired wood burner, one must record data over a complete firing cycle and then integrate results to obtain an average.  This is further complicated by the fact that heat of combustion changes with time.  That for carbon, for instance (near burn-out), is about 30,000 kJ/kg.  Since the overall HHV for biomass is 20,000 kJ/kg, that for the volatiles must be lower than this.

What about moisture condensation? Mark Knaebe advocates improving efficiency by increasing heat exchange surface to the extent that water in the flue gas is condensed, adding its latent heat to the useful Q.  This requires dropping flue gas temperature below the dew point.  With low amounts of excess air, the dew point might be as high as 60 deg-C, but with 400% excess air, where many pellet stoves operate, the dew point is nearer 30 deg-C.  
As cleaner appliances develop, the prospect of taking advantage of this extra heat becomes more intriguing because the condensate will be purer and non-fouling.  The added heat transfer surface and increased capital cost, however, may not be practical.  
Ray Albrecht suggests that temperatures in the range of 1000oC or greater are needed to achieve good burnout of flue gases.  He stresses the importance of preserving flame temperature by insulating the combustion chamber to make sure reaction is complete before gases enter the heat exchanger.
Staging the air feed can promote gasification and partial combustion at low excess air conditions where temperatures are higher.  Preheat can almost deliver a one-to-one increase of flame temperature with increased feed air temperature.  Staging and preheat are common in newer biomass burners. 
Catalysts are another important way to promote oxidation at lower temperatures than those needed otherwise.  




[1]Alliance for Green Heat press release [Oct. 27, 2015]  http://www.forgreenheat.org/decathlon/intro.html
[2]For simplicity, assume it is burning at “steady-state” where flow rates and temperatures are constant; not changing with time.  This is true of many pellet stoves and large-scale furnaces.  Small batch-fed systems do experience cycles and are more complex to analyze, but the steady-state analysis gives a useful result even for these systems.
[3]Unfortunately, fuel energy can be expressed in multiple ways, depending on how it was measured–giving different numbers for the same fuel.  As argued in BCI Bulletin #1, HHV or the Higher Heating Value is preferred and will be the only one considered here.
[4]A phrase attributed to the 20th century comic-strip character “Pogo.” 

Heated Up!

Alliance for Green Warmth to undertake wooden stove alter out evaluation for West Penn Electricity Sustainable Energy Fund

Posted by Earth Stove on March 22, 2016 with No Comments as , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
March 22, 2016 – The Alliance for Environmentally friendly Warmth acquired a $ fifteen,600 grant from West Penn Energy Sustainable Energy Fund (WPPSEF) for a wooden stove adjust out evaluation.
The grant money will be utilized to suggest alternatives for plans that remove present older stoves, and substitute them with new, wood burning appliances that fulfill or exceed the U.S. Environmental Defense Company (EPA) 2020 New&nbspSource Efficiency Requirements wooden heater restrictions.&nbsp This kind of a software must also consist of a measurement and verification ingredient that ensures existing wooden stoves are taken off, taken off the market, and disposed of.

In addition, the venture will check out the integration of a wood stove modify out system into existing funding or incentive packages, as properly as a household vitality performance software that will drastically minimize wooden smoke emissions and deal with home ease and comfort and air high quality security worries.
“Woody biomass is an plentiful renewable warmth feedstock which has been employed by generations to offer low-value heating for residences throughout Pennsylvania. &nbspWPPSEF seeks to much better comprehend how older wooden burning stoves can be changed by point out-of-the art stoves that fulfill or exceeds EPA’s 2020 New Supply Performance Specifications even though making certain the outdated stove is removed from the marketplace.&nbsp WPPSEF is striving to build a price-effective plan that support homeowners exchange their old wood stove and although enhancing neighborhood air top quality and residence comfort” suggests Joel Morrison, Director of the WPPSEF.
&nbsp# &nbsp# &nbsp#
The Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat encourages present day wooden and pellet heating programs as a minimal-carbon, sustainable and inexpensive energy solution. The Alliance operates to progress cleaner and much more productive household heating engineering, particularly for reduced and center-cash flow households. Launched in 2009, the Alliance is an impartial non-profit group and is tax-exempt beneath part 501c3 of the tax code.
The West Penn Energy Sustainable Strength Fund (WPPSEF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that invests in the deployment of sustainable strength systems that gain West Penn Electricity ratepayers in Pennsylvania. WPPSEF investments are targeted in a few broad groups:
ü&nbsp Deployment of sustainable and clear vitality systems
ü&nbsp Deployment of vitality effectiveness and conservation systems and
ü&nbsp Facilitating financial growth, environmental betterment, and community training as they relate to sustainable strength deployment in the WPP services location.
Visit http://www.wppsef.orgfor additional data.

###

Heated Up!