Federal government Report States Wood & Pellet Heat Dominates Household Renewables

Posted by Earth Stove on October 10, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , , , , ,
The 2014 Winter season Fuel Outlook launched by the US Power Info Agency on Oct. seven, predicted that wooden and pellet heating would carry on the pattern of becoming the nation’s fasting expanding warmth supply. &nbspOverall, wooden and pellet heating grew 38% from 2004 to 2013, and now accounts for 2.five% of all house principal heating.
The EIA predicts wooden and pellet heating will expand once more in the 2014/15 winter by 4.7%. &nbspElectricity is predicted to increase second quickest at three.one%. Organic fuel is at .07% development and oil and propane are each and every predicted to drop by about 3.two%. &nbspRegional knowledge shows wooden and pellet heating developing more than 7% in the northeast and Midwest, and only two.five% in the south and 1.eight% in the west. It was only two a long time in the past that the EIA started out to contain wooden and pellets in the 2012 Winter Fuel Outlook, even however considerably more residences have wooden and pellet stoves than have oil furnaces.

Nationally, solar and geothermal dominate headlines and media imagery, but wood and pellet heating stay the dominant gamers in minimizing fossil fuel utilization at the residential degree. &nbspIn 2014, the EIA says wooden and pellet heat will produce .58 quadrillion Btu, or 67% of the nation’s total, although household solar will generate .twenty five quadrillion Btu, or 29%. &nbspMeanwhile, geothermal creates only .04, or 4%, and is not showing constant increases like solar.
Whilst wood and pellets are the quickest growing heating gas in The united states, residential solar is increasing even faster in the electrical energy market. At current rates, residential photo voltaic could produce a lot more strength than residential wood and pellet stoves by 2020. &nbspSolar has loved generous taxpayer subsidies with a thirty% federal tax credit rating in addition to condition incentives. &nbspThe federal solar credit rating is set to expire at the conclude of 2016, but by then the expense of solar panels may have diminished ample for ongoing expansion with out federal subsidies.
Wood and pellet heating and solar are not competing technologies in that 1 generates electricity and the other heat. &nbspThey are usually mixed to make a residence practically carbon neutral, a approach which is transferring far more quickly in Europe than in the US due to higher fossil gas costs and favorable govt policies. &nbsp
In Europe, a lot of international locations are aggressively incentivizing greater effectiveness pellet stoves and pellet boilers. &nbsp&nbspIn the US, the Bush and Obama Administrations did not push for incentives for cleaner and more efficient pellet tools but relatively has permit Congress and industry shape a tax credit score with out any successful efficiency or emission criteria. &nbspAs a outcome, the growth in the wood and pellet sector is not predominantly an enlargement of cleaner and far more efficient products, as it is in Europe.&nbsp Sales of cleaner pellet stoves are increasing in the US, but the progress of wooden heating in America contains some really polluting products this sort of as outdoor wood boilers, also knows as outside hydronic heaters and new&nbspunregulated wooden stoves that have no emissions expectations.&nbsp Right after several many years of delays, the EPA is last but not least regulating these systems and necessitating them to meet up with emission specifications by summer time of 2015.&nbsp
With no successful federal laws from the EPA, some states have been guiding the marketplace towards cleaner and much more effective wood and pellet heating products, with Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon and Washington having the guide.

Heated Up!

Image essay: wooden stoves around the entire world

Posted by Earth Stove on October 7, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , ,
Heating with wood stoves is much more and more widespread in a variety of nations around the world all around the world, with rising fossil gasoline rates, incentives, poverty and access to other affordable fuels component of the picture. &nbspWe manufactured an try to present typical stoves in more than a dozen nations around the world, exposing a common difficulty of reliance on old, inefficient stoves. &nbspMost countries outdoors of North The usa and Western Europe have no restrictions that set specific make a difference expectations for new stoves. &nbspThe problem of community funding of modify out programs is typically not an selection. &nbsp
With the concentrate on renewable electric power, several nations are neglecting the development of a era of cleaner wooden and pellet heating stove engineering.&nbsp The issue of building cleaner prepare dinner stoves internationally has acquired traction, but aiding impoverished wooden and pellet stove customers in temperate international locations is not yet a key public policy problem.&nbsp This has been the situation in the United States the place pellet stoves have been systematically sidelined in favor of generous federal and state subsidies for photo voltaic panels, resulting in an increased reliance on old, uncertified stoves. &nbspWood stove technological innovation is establishing in several nations, as shown in some of the images under.&nbsp But the pace is considerably also gradual to match the economic possibilities and environmental positive aspects that wooden gives, as nicely as the air top quality dangers inefficient combustion can in any other case pose.

The problem is turning out to be more and more global: the political and navy crisis in Ukraine is driving increasing reliance on old and new stoves in a lot of nations around the world while the banking disaster in the US and Europe has contributed to a meltdown in Greece, leading to common unemployment and a nationwide wood stove resurgence.&nbsp
Wooden stoves are significantly a lot more seriously utilised by rural, minimal and middle-earnings populations about the world who usually absence the political clout required to influence choice makers. &nbspInstead of building the technology to reduce its polluting effects, choice makers frequently limit its use, more squeezing vulnerable populations. &nbspThe&nbsppublic wellness implications necessitate that we must quickly reduce wooden smoke, but the answer want not rely on heavily sponsored fossil gas infrastructures that have dire worldwide warming consequences. &nbspWood and pellet stoves keep great guarantee as a renewable heating technological innovation as they become much more cleanse and effective.

The effort led by the International Alliance for Clear Cookstoves is an exceptional design of cooperative R&ampD, funding and training. It is time we develop a similar model for warmth stoves.

Byurakan, Armenia






Georgia (formerly USSR)




&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp&nbsp


New Zealand


South Ossetian Autonomous Oblast&nbsp

(previous USSR)


St. Petersburg,&nbspRussia

Sikkim, India



United States

Heated Up!

Last Report on Wood Stove Decathlon from Brookhaven Lab

Posted by Earth Stove on September 12, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , ,
Reproduced underneath are the absract and introduction of a seventeen-website page paper that provides an excellent overview of the specialized aspects of screening stoves on the Nationwide Mall for the Wood Stove Decathlon, held in November 2013. &nbspTo go through the whole report, click on listed here.

Progressive good particulate measurement systems for the Wood Stove Design Problem&nbsp
R. Trojanowski1, T. Butcher1, C. Brown1, G. Wei1, Y. Ahn2 , and J. Wong2&nbsp
one. Vitality Conversion Team, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, United states of america&nbsp
two. Chemical and Molecular Engineering Office, Stony Brook College, Stony Brook, New York, United states of america&nbsp
The increasing price of fossil assets has contributed to the enhance in the amount of wooden-fired household heating appliances. Wood stoves are typically neglected by the community as a cleanse and renewable source owing to worries about particulate (PM) emissions. In purchase to achieve acceptance in the market the Alliance for Eco-friendly Heat and
Popular Mechanics magazine initiated a Wooden Stove Style Challenge (WSDC). The selected groups created stoves that included the greatest methods in style and procedure to maximize performance and reduce PM and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions given that most frequently high emissions are noticed as a result of incomplete combustion. Additional, a screening protocol for the obstacle was produced exclusively to measure the emissions in a non-laboratory environment. Normal screening procedures may possibly not be agent of in-use fuel and operational techniques and, thanks to the opposition location and timetable contstraints, could not be utilised for the WSDC. New transportable PM sampling technology introduced in the European market place recently was adopted for the competitors and evaluated to present U.S. PM measurement approaches to construct a correlation.&nbsp

Tom Butcher makes use of the Wohler transportable
particulate sampler to test a stove.
&nbspAs the value of heating oil has improved, much more people in the northeastern location of the United States have returned to heating with wooden. Most present wooden stoves date from ahead of the Environmental Security Agency (EPA) carried out emission certification demands for these products. These much less effective wooden stoves often cause higher amounts of smoke, yielding particulates identified to set off coughs, throat and mucosal irritation, acute respiratory bacterial infections, occurrence of asthma and other conditions over extended exposure. A evaluation from Bølling et al. described residential wood combustion has also been reported to contribute substantially to raised stages of air air pollution regionally, each with respect to enhanced stages of fine particles (particulate make a difference with an equal aerodynamic diameter &lt 2.5 μm PM2.five), the natural and organic particle portion, particle sure polycyclic fragrant hydrocarbons (PAH) and volatile organic compounds. Even people wooden stoves that do meet up with EPA’s Section II requirements might have unacceptably large emissions once in use. This is thanks to many factors like the style of the equipment,&nbspweather designs and location, combustion exercise, wood species and good quality, and operator habits. Whilst the EPA is establishing new laws, the take a look at strategy used for certification is not representative of in-use fueling and operational procedures.&nbsp
Types that enhance combustion and emission functionality, thermal effectiveness, and operational &nbsp
The Decathlon tent on the Nationwide
Shopping mall, in between the Capitol and
the Washington monument

variability are required in the U.S. heating marketplace. Modern wooden stoves have revealed diminished described emission aspects in contrast to typical wooden stoves, 34-330 mg/MJ from 50-2100 mg/MJ, respectively. Nevertheless, if the modern stoves are not operated appropriately the combustion overall performance can be compromised yielding increased emissions.

This function showcased superior systems that could help tackle the dilemma of enhanced particulate emissions and empower the continued use of wood as a renewable gasoline. The groups chosen arrived from various backgrounds, ranging from set up wooden stove companies to independent inventors and engineering pupil groups. Some of the stoves chosen for the WSDC were controlled by microprocessors and connected to smartphones whilst other folks were extremely-successful stoves primarily based on seventeenth century Scandinavian styles. A number of condition-of-the-art hybrid stoves that are previously on the industry ended up also included4. 6 of the twelve finalists have been from Europe.&nbsp
Groups had been judged on their innovation, emission and effectiveness overall performance, affordability and buyer relieve. In November 2013 on the National Mall in Washington D.C., ten judges (produced up of top experts from Popular Mechanics, the New York State Energy and Research Advancement Authority (NYSERDA), the U.S. Forest Support, Washington Point out Section of Ecology, DOE’s Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), The Biomass Thermal Strength Council (BTEC), the Osprey Basis, the Masonry Heater Association and UC Berkeley) examined and assessed the 12 stove finalists and announced an all round winner as properly as winners in certain classes.&nbsp
A essential challenge in this opposition was measuring the particulate emissions accurately in a discipline atmosphere. This task sought to create an energy effectiveness and emissions testing protocol for the WSDC which decreases the variability due to gas and functions. The present normal examination strategy (EPA Strategy 28) entails testing stoves utilizing a dilution tunnel. Given that the WSDC was held&nbspat the mall in Washington D.C., this take a look at strategy would not suit and so there was the&nbspchallenge of measuring the emissions in a repeatable actual-time way, in a non-laboratory atmosphere. Just lately, new moveable particulate measurement programs have been launched in Europe for area inspection of biomass heating systems. Two particular products were chosen for use in this project the Testo 380 and Wöhler SM 500. Equally analyzers are a low price selection and supply the advantage of relieve and portability.&nbsp
To establish the precision, precision, instrument variety, and applicability for use in the WSDC for thermal performance and emissions of these transportable immediate evaluate analyzers, an analysis was executed even though at the same time adhering to the regular methods for deciding the emissions. &nbspFrom laboratory screening, BNL created a screening protocol implementing the analyzers for the competition.

To go through the entire PDF report, click right here.

For far more information about the 2013 Decathlon, click here.

For details about the 2014 Collaborative Stove Design Workshop, click here.

Heated Up!

U.S. Forest Provider to Assistance Venture to Redesign the Wood Stove

Posted by Earth Stove on September 6, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , , ,
The&nbspU.S.&nbspForest Service is identified mostly for managing forests, but they are branching out to aid concentrate on how cleanly wood can be burned to warmth residences.&nbsp The Forest Service’s “Rural Revitalization By way of Forestry” software is offering a two-year $ 25,000 grant to help the “Subsequent Generation Wood Stove Design Challenge,”&nbspthat aims to discover cost-effective techniques to decrease smoke from wood stoves via automation.&nbsp
The Challenge is a coalition work led by the&nbspAlliance for Eco-friendly Warmth, a Maryland primarily based non-earnings.&nbsp This fall the coalition is gathering at Brookhaven Countrywide Lab to evaluate and examination automatic wooden stoves, the place shoppers load the wood and leave – and enable personal computers improve efficiency and reduce pollution.
“Residential heating with wood gives People in america a homegrown resource of renewable strength that not
Julie Tucker, National Direct for Wood
Energy at the US Forest Provider with
Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell

only saves them cash, but retains their energy dollars nearby.&nbsp This is particularly important for rural communities that have few alternatives to switch to for their energy requirements.” &nbspsaid Julie Tucker, National Guide for Wood Power at the U.S. Forest Provider.&nbsp&nbsp“The&nbspWood Stove Style Challenge&nbspoffers a incredible opportunity to develop the most successful and cleanest burning residential wooden stoves for individuals who are hunting for an different to high value fossil gas heating” Tucker explained.

The initiative is looking at high tech options, regulatory boundaries to cleaner stoves, customer choices and the ability of an sector to adapt to new technological innovation.
The Wooden Stove Style Obstacle helps design and organize forums for companies, innovators, and college groups to perform on modernizing biomass stoves.&nbsp &nbspAutomated wood stoves currently being created and good-tuned for the&nbspNovember occasion&nbspare coming from Indiana, Maryland, Connecticut, Denmark, Germany, New Zealand and China.&nbsp Whilst they are competing in opposition to every single other to see which is cleanest, most successful and most error evidence, the designers are also coming to share their insights and engineering with other teams and contributors from the US stove industry.&nbsp&nbsp
One particular of the coalition leaders is Mark Knaebe, a wooden combustion professional&nbspat the&nbspUSDA&nbspForest Items Laboratory&nbspin Madison, Wisconsin.&nbsp Knaebe&nbspis functioning on a highly revolutionary prototype of a condensing wood stove that could substantially minimize emissions and enhance effectiveness in comparison to existing stoves.&nbsp Knaebe will be helping to assess the automatic stoves at Brookhaven Lab in November.
All 9 states in the Northeast knowledgeable a fifty% leap in the number of homes that rely on wood as the major heating source from 2005 to 2012 (Power Data Company 2014).&nbsp&nbspNationally, the surge in wood heating because 2000 has been a welcomed change all around for the pellet and firewood sector, and for minimizing fossil gasoline utilization.&nbsp

Heated Up!

Non-public talks yield consensus on key problems in EPA wooden heater restrictions

Posted by Earth Stove on September 5, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , , ,
In July, three gentlemen fulfilled in Canada for delicate, private meetings to see if they could achieve settlement on important sections of the proposed EPA wood heater rules.&nbsp Two represented regional air high quality agencies and a single represented the wood stove and boiler business.&nbsp They were ready to compromise on many troubles, but have been too far aside to attain any arrangement on a lot of other people.&nbsp Much more than a thirty day period later on, right after consulting with their associates, they flew to Washington and presented their consensus positions to EPA Performing Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe.
The a few folks had been Arthur Marin of the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Administration
Arthur Marin, Govt Director of

(NESCAUM), Dan Johnson of Western States Air Assets Council (WESTAR) and Jack Goldman of the Hearth, Patio &amp Barbecue Affiliation (HPBA).&nbsp The meeting arose from initiatives by the air organizations and it was agreed that only the principals of every institution would get part in the experience-to-experience conferences as they had been under a tight timeline and needed to maintain the discussions high-stage.&nbsp

The EPA was not component of these conversations nor present, and is below no obligation to adopt any of the consensus positions. However, it is expected that the agency is very likely to adopt a lot of, if not almost all of them.
Most of the regions of settlement ended up around offer-through, grandfathering, certification extension and cordwood tests timelines.&nbsp There was no point out of emission ranges in the document.&nbsp The EPA will put up the 3-website page consensus document in the official report shortly.
Jack Goldman, CEO of HPBA
The positions replicate an effort by the a few establishments to achieve consensus but do not always replicate the positions of all the groups’ users.&nbsp Some manufacturers come to feel that the HPBA has not represented them aggressively sufficient, and the consensus positions offer with every single technological innovation really otherwise.&nbsp For illustration, the consensus position is toughest on outdoor boilers as it does not advise any grandfathering or offer-by means of of unqualified boilers.&nbsp The situation on exempt wooden stoves is much more lenient: a a single-yr offer-via.&nbsp Even much more lenient is the placement on unregulated indoor warm air furnaces, which would get a 1-yr extension for manufacturing and an added sell-by way of year, for a whole of two a long time.

Janet McCabe, EPA Performing Assistant
Administrator of the Office of
Air and&nbspRadiation

The other major region of arrangement is that the swap to cordwood tests for certification must occur, but it is not possible to put into action right away.&nbsp Both sides agree that the EPA should move in that direction but a obviously described check method and a far more sturdy databases of cordwood testing is required.&nbsp However, the consensus paper is silent on the drawn out ASTM cord wooden fueling protocol method and alternatively proposes that a cordwood protocol be designed by a working team established by the EPA under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). This would be the protocol utilized to develop the database of emissions from cordwood screening.&nbsp It is unclear if this protocol could capture commence-up emissions, or how it would greater represent genuine world emission profiles in consumers’ homes.

The consensus positions produced no point out of pellet stoves, hangtags or a lot of other contentious problems.&nbsp Typically, concerns have been not described in the document since they ended up not integrated in the discussions.&nbsp For case in point, the concern of client hangtags, which sector opposed in their comments, was reportedly not raised by possibly facet.

An additional quite significant consensus placement is that all boilers that are qualified by New York (and tested by EPA methods) &nbspon the powerful day of the rule will have their certifications extended for 5 many years.&nbsp This might indicate that producers will not have to bear the time and price of retesting any of their current units for a five year period of time and as an alternative emphasis their efforts on redesigning cleaner stoves. &nbspVirtually all the exempt and unregulated pellet stoves are previously likely by means of the certification method and several wooden stoves are utilizing the “K record” to get new five calendar year certifications. &nbspThese new certifications and “freshening up” of existing ones would have offered most stoves certifications up to four years into the new rule.

If the EPA adopts these tips, it would supply aid to most manufacturers and merchants.&nbsp Even so, the EPA could nonetheless established Phase two requirements, which would take effect in 2020, as reduced as 1.three grams for each hour for wooden and pellet stoves.&nbsp Many observers feel that the EPA is not probably to require this kind of a low emission degree and some in industry say they would be relieved if the EPA settled at 3 grams for every hour.

The key positions of agreement are outlined underneath.&nbsp Preserve in mind that these agreements, if adopted by the EPA, would begin on the efficient day of the regulation, which will most likely be in May possibly of 2015:

one. Woodstoves:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Unregulated and exempt stoves cannot be made.
b)&nbsp&nbsp &nbspRetail revenue of all exempt and qualified stoves (up to seven.5 g/hr for non-cat stoves) cam keep on for one particular yr.
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Certification of stoves that meet Sept 1 stages (proposed at 4.five g/hr) will be prolonged for 5 many years or until Phase two emissions requirements take influence.
2. Hydronic Heaters (indoor and out of doors):
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Only New York certified heaters may possibly be made.
b)&nbsp&nbsp Retail product sales of boilers that are not EPA Phase 2 experienced – and accredited by New York – are not authorized. (New York&nbspneeds a thorough regulatory evaluation procedure for certification.)
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Designs analyzed to EPA’s voluntary plan&nbspandlicensed by New York will be considered accredited for five years.
3. Warm Air Furnaces:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Supply a one-year extension to continue production unregulated furnaces.
b)&nbsp&nbsp Retail revenue might be allowed for a single year over and above the effective day.
four. Cord wood:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp The transition to twine wooden screening to certify new heaters should be executed&nbspfor Phase 2 but will require a sturdy database and EPA accepted strategy.

five. Oversight of Labs:
a)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Labs will supply thirty times recognize of testing to states to let for federal and state accessibility to witness emission tests.
b)&nbsp&nbsp All certification info associated to emissions should be publicly offered.
c)&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Provide states with partial delegation of authority more than some enforcement and compliance concerns and prohibit them from action on other issues.

The previously mentioned summary does not capture all the element and nuance of these 5 areas of consensus.&nbsp Please refer to the original “Consensus Positions” for specific language that was agreed upon by HPBA, NESCAUM and WESTAR.

“We commend NESCAUM, WESTAR and HPBA for enterprise this crucial work and for their willingness to all make sizeable compromises,” stated John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Eco-friendly Warmth. &nbsp”We urge the EPA to adopt these suggestions in the NSPS and to provide the enforcement to quickly shut any loopholes that might emerge after implementation,” Ackerly ongoing.

The consensus positions may possibly give producers and merchants far more certainty about what they can construct and distribute in the months foremost up to the promulgation.&nbsp It is also achievable that the EPA has presented some assurance to sector about the probability of some of these provisions.&nbsp The EPA might have previously made a decision some of what was contained in the Consensus Place paper.&nbsp For instance, it is noted that the EPA had made a decision not to use cordwood for certification tests in 2015 months prior to the meetings between industry and air companies.&nbsp
It is most likely that most key conclusions on the NSPS have presently been manufactured or are near to last as the ultimate draft of the NSPS will be submitted to the Business office of Spending budget and Management in October.&nbsp Even the tips in the Consensus paper had been late for thought by the EPA.
This consensus paper might not make litigation considerably less probably, but it could decrease the quantity of issues that are probably to be litigated.&nbsp Longer offer-by means of intervals, for instance, in contrast to the extremely short types in the proposed NSPS, will lessen economic impacts on numerous little businesses, making the small enterprise issue much more challenging to litigate. &nbspFurther, this work in between air companies and the sector trade team that had been important protagonists throughout much of the discussion all around the proposal propose a a lot more collaborative connection can be forged amongst these parties to aid apply a new NSPS.

NESCAUM is an association of the 8 northeastern states, such as New Jersey, New York and the New England States.&nbsp On NSPS issues, Maine is not getting represented by NESCAUM and is taking far more pro-industry positions.&nbsp WESTAR now signifies fifteen states, from Alaska to New Mexico.&nbsp People states represent an even wider selection of the political spectrum than people in NESCAUM, but none have produced the open crack with their association that Maine has. &nbsp

Heated Up!

EPA supplies short summary of NSPS feedback

Posted by Earth Stove on September 1, 2014 with No Comments as , , , ,
At a&nbspwood smoke conference at the College of Montana last thirty day period, the EPA did a presentation of

the position of the NSPS that incorporated a single slide that summarized stakeholder feedback on the NSPS.&nbsp This summary is the first one particular, to our information, that presents some insight into how the EPA views responses from stakeholders and which topics it regards as some of the most important.

The conference was a key gathering of wood smoke experts, air air pollution companies and a couple of associates of wood stove companies.

The frequent reference to states infers that their views are actively playing a significant role, together with industry.&nbsp The numerous references to “some manufacturers” point out that they are paying focus to problems exactly where market is not united.&nbsp &nbspThe reference to “electronic reporting” is about the move from paper to digital submissions of check and compliance knowledge from the EPA authorized take a look at labs to the EPA.&nbsp&nbsp
Larry Brockman, who represents the EPA’s voluntary wood heat programs, was at the Montana meeting and gave the presentation:
*Environmental/well being corporations, nearly all states, most of the community and some makers are quite supportive.
* States oppose permitting the full five years for recent certifications at 1988 NSPS levels.
* Industry would like grandfathering in addition promote-through of inventory.
* States want requirements for noticeable emissions, proper-sizing (strength audits), hangtags and appropriate installation and operation.
* Business and states want digital reporting.
* Stakeholders agree that compliance check techniques should use true globe situations, e.g., wire wood but some producers concern the adequacy of the existing databases.”
The total EPA presentation and the other presentations at the conference can be located on the EPA website.&nbspFor our summary of stakeholder feedback to the NSPS, click on below.

The convention sponsors included the&nbspUniversity of Montana College student Chapter of Air &amp Waste Administration Association, Montana Department of Environmental High quality, American Lung Association of the Mountain Pacific, Missoula Town-County Health Division, and the Heart for Environmental Health Sciences. For much more about the conference.

Heated Up!

New Paper Undermines Stove Industry Variability Research

Posted by Earth Stove on August 29, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , ,
A new paper written by Woodstock Soapstone, a New Hampshire wooden stove maker, phone calls a essential stove business examine misleading and flawed.&nbsp The market research suggests the inherent variability in wood stove testing implies that the EPA cannot reduce emissions requirements under four.5 grams an hour.&nbsp
The EPA posted the 7-web page Woodstock Soapstone paper today as portion of the formal file that the EPA can use to figure out the ultimate rule because of in February 2015.&nbsp It was composed by the company’s CEO, Tom Morrissey, and claims the industry variability review is “based on a info sample that is modest, previous and deeply flawed.”&nbsp
The late Paul Tiegs from OMNI
&nbsptest labs was a &nbspprominent
critic of variability becoming caused
primarily by gas.

Morrissey’s paper argues that variability has considerably more to do with regardless of whether a producer is spending&nbspfor emission certification than inherent variability in the combustion approach. “When a manufacturer pays for certification screening, why are the results so a lot much better than at any other time the same stove is analyzed?” Morrissey asks. &nbspThe Alliance for Eco-friendly Warmth thinks, as the Morrissey paper also suggests, that check labs have a range of running procedures allowed by the EPA that can consequence in variable emission results. &nbspThe late take a look at lab icon Paul Tiegs, a founder of Omni check labs, turned a champion of tightening testing protocols to achieve regularity in tests, and rejected the notion that variability was primarily induced by reliable fuel, as the business review argues.

If the EPA, states, and air companies just take the Woodstock Soapstone paper severely, it could unhinge a major industry lawful method in the combat towards stricter air pollution boundaries.&nbsp Several officials in the EPA and point out air agencies ended up presently essential or at the very least skeptical of the sector variability research.&nbsp However, there has not been this kind of a in depth critique from inside (or outside) the stove industry prior to this.
The variability review was developed and composed by Rick Curkeet, a fireplace merchandise engineer at the Intertek testing lab and Robert Ferguson, a specialist who is now functioning for HPBA on the proposed EPA rules.&nbsp It was launched in October 2010 in anticipation of the proposed EPA regulations and is known as the “EPA Wooden Heater Test Technique Variability Research: Analysis of Uncertainty, Repeatability and Reproducibility.”&nbsp

The examine showed that there is a really broad range of variability among proficiency screening and certification screening of wood stoves.&nbsp HPBA contends that “it is arbitrary for EPA to determine … a worth that is decrease than the precision range” of the check technique. &nbspHPBA says the minimum justifiable emission restrict is 4.five grams an hour, which Washington Condition adopted in 1995 and has because become a de facto nationwide standard.&nbsp The variability review does not say who paid for it but HPBA confirmed that they provided partial funding and thoroughly vetted early drafts in late summer and early fall of 2010.

Even though Morrissey’s paper is by much the most direct critique of the variability examine, most specialists concur that the understanding of variability in wood stove screening can be assessed in numerous much more approaches than the info established used by this business review.&nbsp For illustration, compliance test knowledge could be utilised.&nbsp The EPA demands that all stoves be retested soon after they make in between two,five hundred and ten,000 units.&nbsp This data, if it could be attained from the EPA, would provide possibly a far more crucial info established than the a single the sector examine chose to use.&nbsp An additional info set will be from the “K list” changes.&nbsp Most stove producers are re-certifying their stoves in progress of the new EPA principles so they will have five a long time before they have to take a look at again.&nbsp HPBA has been encouraging its users to recertify stoves with “K list” changes as they are allowed to do by the EPA so that they will not have to encounter higher tests expenses that consist of twine wooden screening and the uncertainty of a new check strategy that may be tougher to go.&nbsp HPBA had urged the EPA to grandfather all stoves below four.five grams an hour until finally 2020.&nbsp In any scenario, these retests will give a new and far better info established to evaluate variability.
Even if substantial variability could be proven and verified making use of different methods and info sets by unbiased professionals, the poor relations in between market and point out air agencies and other essential gamers has undermined the ability of the two sides to concur on much.&nbsp At a November 2012 assembly in Minneapolis convened by NESCAUM, Greg Eco-friendly of the EPA remaining the place and urged the two sides to chat much more among on their own.&nbsp That technique did not operate and quite little effective interaction occurred for more than a yr, a consequence that is most likely not helpful to the passions of HPBA sector members.&nbsp
Greg Environmentally friendly, Alison Simcox and Gil&nbsp
Wood&nbspof the EPA listening to testimony&nbsp
at&nbspthe Boston listening to on the NSPS.

The tough line technique to critics is what prompted Morrissey to create his rebuttal of the variability review which begins as a defense of test reports of his personal stoves that experienced been named into serious issue by HPBA, Rick Curkeet and Roger Purinton at Jotul stoves in official responses to the EPA.&nbsp Ironically, proof that catalytic or non-catallytic wooden stoves can be regularly clear has grow to be the largest danger to the mainstream stove market that HPBA represents.&nbsp This conflict between cleaner catalytic stoves and not-as-thoroughly clean non-catalytic stoves turned very heated and community in an EPA listening to in Boston on February 26, 2014.&nbsp But it was preceded by the release of research in 2013 by non-catalytic makers that dismissed the performance of catalytic stoves to reduce wood smoke in real entire world settings.&nbsp If this community rift inside of HPBA had not occurred, the stove sector would most likely have manufactured it via the EPA rule producing with a a lot far more unified voice.&nbsp
According to interviews with non-catalytic stove companies, they felt it was important for the EPA to realize that quite low emission figures from catalytic stoves in screening labs did not accurately replicate emissions in peoples’ houses as catalysts often clog, are not replaced, and are not correctly engaged and used by buyers.&nbsp This problem has proved to be essential because the EPA proposed emission restrictions of one.3 grams an hour in 2020, a amount that only a few catalytic stoves can seem to meet.&nbsp The firm that has made checks displaying it can fulfill it is Woodstock Soapstone.
The Woodstock Soapstone defense of its take a look at results and critique of the variability research will come at an essential time when the EPA is finalizing its new wood heater requirements, recognized as the New Supply Overall performance Expectations (NSPS).&nbsp It is considered that as of September or October, the EPA personnel will have produced most of their important selections to ship to Washington for overview and acceptance by senior EPA officials and EPA legal professionals.&nbsp Makes an attempt among HPBA and air agencies to attain any agreements driving the scenes could even now be fruitful, but time is running out.&nbsp And even if any agreements could be attained, the EPA might not undertake them.
The regulation and emission restrictions for out of doors wooden boilers are also hotly contested but the testing variability for boilers is not a massive problem, nor is it an concern with pellet stoves.&nbsp A single remedy, supported in portion by the Alliance for Green Warmth, would be to set independent emissions specifications for pellet stoves, catalytic stoves and non-catalytic stoves, based mostly on how thoroughly clean each technologies has become.&nbsp The argument for separating pellet stoves from cat and non-cat wood stoves could be even stronger since they use a various and very uniform gasoline and are burned in a much far more managed combustion location.&nbsp The Catalytic Fireplace Caucus, of which Woodstock Soapstone is a member, strongly opposed separate emission limits for cat and non-cat stoves as effectively.&nbsp&nbspUltimately, HPBA did not recommend setting separate emission restrictions that Jotul and other non-catalytic producers initially appeared to help.&nbsp At this position in the procedure, the EPA may possibly have presently decided to established a one emission normal for these very various technologies, as they had proposed.
If senior management at EPA sees reputable data that at minimum a single stove can constantly be tested under one.3 grams an hour, they now have a greater authorized foundation to adhere to their proposed one.three gram an hour normal.&nbsp And this is the nightmare state of affairs that HPBA and non-catalytic stove makers worry.
Stove authorities like Tom Morrissey, Robert Ferguson and Rick Curkeet are not only savvy about how stoves are tested, they are also competent amount crunchers.&nbsp Decoding stove examination info is like any other knowledge established: it can generate extremely diverse conclusions dependent on what information is employed, how it is interpreted and what statistical approaches are used.&nbsp The EPA in turn has to evaluate the trustworthiness of each research and they can fairly assume that their assessments will be challenged in courtroom.
Tom Morrissey, leading, 2nd from correct and
the staff that developed and built the
Perfect Metal for a 2013 competitiveness

The stove that Tom Morrissey says is reliably and constantly much less than one.3 grams an hour was exclusively constructed to acquire the 2013 Wood Stove Style Obstacle, and it did. The Wooden Stove Decathlon judged stove on five classes: emissions, effectiveness, affordability, customer attractiveness and innovation.&nbsp The Excellent Metal Hybrid is licensed by the EPA at 1. grams an hour and receives 82% efficiency.&nbsp A 2nd location winner, the Cape Cod, was a equivalent hybrid stove by Travis Industries that is qualified at even reduce&nbsp .05 grams an hour.&nbsp Travis however does not say that they can reliably or constantly take a look at at this kind of lower emission quantities, specifically with wire wooden.&nbsp Woodstock Soapstone says tests shows that their Excellent Metal Hybrid is as clean with twine wooden as it is with crib wooden.

The Alliance for Environmentally friendly Warmth encourages cleaner and a lot more productive residential wooden heating to minimize our reliance on fossil fuels and assist people affordably warmth their houses.&nbsp Started in 2009, the Alliance is based in Takoma Park, Maryland and is registered as a non-revenue, 501c3 instructional firm.

Heated Up!

Firewood Photos Inform Global Tale

Posted by Earth Stove on August 28, 2014 with No Comments as , , , ,

Images of firewood from all around the world have numerous stories to notify.&nbsp From little sticks collected in Uganda to the huge tree trunks for out of doors boilers in America, it is a story of scarcity and loads.&nbsp It is also a story of mechanization, gender roles and even of survival itself.&nbsp As our earth faces a altering local climate from making use of way too a lot fossil gasoline, in some countries using much more firewood is a remedy, and in other international locations, making use of much less is critical. &nbsp

Virtually three out of 7.2 billion folks on our earth use wooden largely to cook their foodstuff on open up fires or conventional cook dinner stoves. &nbspBut options in the created world and the creating planet emphasis more on receiving cleaner and far more efficient appliances into use, not on striving to get family members to change from wooden to a fossil gasoline or another renewable. &nbspSustainability is not just about forest potential, but also the potential of neighborhood folks in any nation to undertake alternatives or use the source greater. &nbspUltimately, the story of firewood is also about public wellness, local weather alter, land use policy and cultural traditions.



Sarejevo, Bosnia








India (for funeral pyres)

Ivory Coastline

Japan (Tsunami particles)




Poland (Jewish Ghetto, 1941)

Sahara desert

Sri Lanka

Soviet Union, 1941


Tibet (drying yak dung fuel)


United States

United States

United States

United States

Heated Up!

NYSERDA Offers Grant to Build Automatic Wood Stove

Posted by Earth Stove on August 14, 2014 with No Comments as , , , , , ,
In an hard work to deliver a lot more automation to the wood stove, New York Point out Vitality Research and Advancement Authority (NYSERDA) is providing a $ 49,000 grant to support the Alliance for Inexperienced Warmth to check and operate in direction of enhancing automated wood stove designs.
The venture will bring some of the world’s leading automated stoves and prototypes to Brookhaven National Lab in November to check their efficiency and assess which types keep the most guarantee in smoke reduction, dependability and buyer demand from customers.&nbsp 7 companieswith different methods to automation are competing in the celebration.
John Rhodes, CEO of NYSERDA
announcing Renewable Heat NY
funding in August 2014
&nbspNYSERDA assist is portion of Governor Cuomo’s Renewable Warmth NY initiative, which encourages the growth of sustainable markets in New York Condition for large-efficiency wooden-fired heating technologies and encourages the use of renewable biomass fuel, these kinds of as cord wooden and wood pellets. NYSERDA has grow to be the greatest supporter of study on household wood and pellet heating engineering in the U.S.&nbsp
This project, called the Collaborative Stove Design and style Workshop, is a follow-on to the effective Wood Stove Decathlon on the Countrywide Mall in November 2013 that was also supported by NYSERDA.&nbsp In contrast to the Decathlon, which was a far more formal technological innovation competitiveness, this Workshop will deliver a selection of experts collectively to examine and aid enhance the automated styles, some of which might be open up sourced so any person can build from them.
“A wood stove is only as great as its operator and its fuel,” mentioned John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Environmentally friendly Warmth (AGH).&nbsp Automation can eradicate the prevalent problem of operators who really do not give their stoves ample air at the right instances, foremost to too much smoke in rural communities, suburban neighborhoods and cities.&nbsp It can also mitigate the dilemma of employing unseasoned wood. “Pellet stove technology represents the most significant breakthrough in household wood heating in the past quarter century but we believe more breakthroughs are feasible,” Ackerly mentioned.
The Organizing Committee that oversees the undertaking is composed of John Ackerly, Alliance for Environmentally friendly Heat Ellen Burkhard, NYSERDA Tom Butcher, Brookhaven Countrywide Lab Craig Issod, founder of Hearth.com Mark Knaebe, US Forest Support Ben Myren, Myren Consulting Dean Still, Aprovecho Study Heart Rod Tinnemore, Washington Division of Ecology and Rebecca Trojanowski, Brookhaven Countrywide Lab.&nbspAdditional funding arrives from the Osprey Foundation and the US Forest Support.

Applications to go to and consider component in the workshop are being accepted until finally September one.

Heated Up!

AGH Remarks to the EPA on New Stove Information

Posted by Earth Stove on August 3, 2014 with No Comments as , ,
Alliance for Inexperienced Heat
Feedback on the
July 1, 2014 Discover of Data Availability
Concerning EPA’s Proposed Expectations of Overall performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Pressured-Air Furnaces, and New Household Masonry Heaters
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734
July 31, 2014
The Alliance for Inexperienced Heat (Alliance), appreciates the opportunity to comment on EPA’s July 1, 2014 Notice of Information Availability (NODA) concerning the agency’s proposed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for wood heating gadgets.[one]&nbsp The Alliance is an impartial non-earnings group that works with environmental and forestry corporations, air good quality experts, the wood and pellet stove sector, and other individuals in the wooden burning neighborhood to market high-efficiency wooden combustion as a reduced-carbon, sustainable, nearby and affordable heating solution.&nbsp The Clean Air Act needs EPA to assessment and revise, if appropriate, the NSPS at minimum each 8 a long time.&nbsp As we explain in the original comments we submitted on the Proposed Rule, the Alliance strongly supports EPA’s decision to update the expectations for wooden stoves and to need a variety of beforehand unregulated wooden heating units to decrease their emissions.&nbsp We also feel that the new expectations, which replicate considerable enhancements in wood heating technologies, are each acceptable and long overdue.&nbsp We offer the subsequent extra remarks in reaction to EPA’s July 1, 2014 NODA.

1st and most importantly, it is essential that, heading ahead, all stoves be essential to comprehensive a take a look at at the most affordable achievable burn up fee placing.&nbsp The knowledge released in the NODA supplied a vital perception that couple of people know: 80% of non-catalytic stoves can’t be effectively tested at the Class one melt away charge (.8 kg/h or less). &nbspUnder the present EPA check approach, Approach 28, these stoves have been authorized to take a look at at the increased Category 2 burn off price, as extended as they can successfully full a take a look at at one. kg/h or less in Category 2.

The possibility of staying away from testing a stove at the least expensive melt away rate—which is when emissions of PM and other toxics are usually the highest—has seemingly developed a loophole that has incentivized some companies to style their stoves so that they fail to hold a flame for a enough volume of time in Class 1, so that they can be tested at the less difficult-to-meet 1. kg/h burn up rate in Class two.&nbsp

If EPA finalizes its proposal to certify stoves based on only the optimum and least expensive burn off charges[two], this prospective loophole could turn into even more critical. &nbspEPA should make clear in the ultimate rule that all stoves qualified underneath the new NSPS must be capable of being analyzed at their lowest burn charge, and that stoves that are not able to successfully complete a check melt away at their least expensive charge will no for a longer time be eligible for certification.

This will still permit stoves to be analyzed at one kg/h but assures that the consumer can’t work the stove at a decrease burn up price.&nbsp We are not opposed to permitting stoves to use a bare minimum burn off price of up to 1.fifteen for cordwood screening, but yet again, they must be productively analyzed at their cheapest melt away price.&nbsp Normally, the proposal to increase the minimum to 1.fifteen kg/h could just enlarge the loophole of stoves tests at higher burn costs than shoppers could run them.

Second, it has turn out to be abundantly distinct in recent months that more and far more producers are using the K listing to make minimal changes in their stoves to ensure five much more several years of sales daily life prior to retesting.&nbsp While the K checklist supplies an critical perform, it is now currently being utilized to drastically hold off retesting of what could be a greater part of EPA certified stoves.&nbsp 1 of the final results of this is that manufacturers can keep away from testing at their least expensive melt away charge and avoid releasing their efficiency data till 2019 for a lot of or most or in some cases, all of their stoves. For this reason, we yet again urge the EPA to demand that B415.one effectiveness numbers using HHV be submitted to the EPA inside of six months of promulgation.&nbsp

The information released in the NODA confirmed prior info sets, that the performance range of pellet stoves is considerably broader than wooden stoves.&nbsp These certified pellet stoves ranged from 62 to eighty% effective with a common deviation of eight.5, double the common deviation of non-cats and four instances the deviation of cat stoves.&nbsp Since of this extensive variation of efficiencies, it is in the general public curiosity to demand efficiencies be introduced as shortly as practicable.&nbsp Manufacturers presently have performance info for most or all of their stoves so there would not be any substantial stress to them.

In addition, we be aware that the information presented in the NODA seems to set up that an emission charge of one.three g/h is currently being attained by some resources in the source group employing twine wooden.&nbsp The Alliance proceeds to assist EPA’s proposed strategy of permitting stoves to be licensed with possibly crib wooden or wire wooden throughout the first phase of the NSPS, and to need certification with cordwood thereafter.&nbsp In addition, the Alliance suggests that EPA keep on to gather take a look at info on wire wood emission prices for non-catalytic stoves more than the following five several years and think about revisiting the emission limitations in the NSPS if extra info propose that the NSPS need to be adjusted for non-catalytic stoves.&nbsp

Lastly, the Alliance has published a blog publish that addresses a variety of troubles related to the data introduced in the NODA.&nbsp We have appended this submit to these responses and request that EPA think about it together with our other responses as it finalizes the Proposed Rule.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Sincerely,
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp /s/ John Ackerly
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Alliance for Green Heat

[1]Expectations of Efficiency for New Household Wooden Heaters, New Household Hydronic Heaters and Compelled-Air Furnaces, and New Household Masonry Heaters, Observe of Data Availability, 79 Fed. Reg. 37,259 (July 1, 2014) [hereinafter “NODA”].
[two]See Proposed Rule, seventy nine Fed. Reg. 6,329, six,367 (Feb. three, 2014).

Heated Up!